O Brien Rhetorical Analysis

Words: 431
Pages: 2

One purpose of storytelling O’Brien highlights throughout the novel, is the importance of conveying emotion as opposed to the literal truth of a story. Throughout the novel, O’Brien writes many stories that he later claims to be false. For example, he tells a story of seeing a young Vietnamese die on a trail, but follows it by claiming that “even that story is made up” (171). He then follows up this anecdote by stating, “I want you to feel what I felt’ (171). Therefore showing that it is not important what actually happened, but the emotion response one gets from reading the story. Also, O’Brien makes it a point to show that stories can save humans. He writes “But this too is true: stories can save us… They’re all dead. But in a story, which is a kind of dreaming, the dead sometimes smile and sit up and return to the world” (213). Even though …show more content…
O’Brien writes “...yet the remembering makes it now. And sometimes remembering will lead to a story, which makes it forever. That's what stories are for. Stories are for joining the past to the future” (36). O’Brien is detailing how stories provide meaning to everyone who reads them. Although, the meaning one receives is up for interpretation. Also, O'Brien is saying how even after one’s memory fades, the stories that are written are eternalized. Storytelling allows O’Brien to process his memories, and make them present. He writes “What stories can do, I guess, is make things present” (172). Stories allow O’Brien to reevaluate his experiences, and clarify things that were previously hazey in his memory. When doing this though, one is getting farther from the actual “truth” of the situation. This time difference between occurrence and storytelling creates some ambiguity within the stories, creating different truths of an event, and therefore show subjectivity within