Obstacles Oedipus The King

Words: 608
Pages: 3

Several products of literature as it involves both of its characters and its audiences have suggested multiple universal truths despite focusing on the building blocks of tragedy and the events that make stories cathartic while using the Aristotelian theory. Without an audience to view the tragic events that are abundant in creativity, a tragic cycle that involves a tragic hero would not fall into place. Which is why through in depth analysis of the events portrayed in Sophacles’ Oedipus Rex while using the Aristotelian theory, the scene of suffering, tragedy, and the tragic hero’s hamartia are tasked with enabling the audience to relate to a character who was at one point at a high status in the world but eventually experienced a significant downfall due to an error. …show more content…
In Oedipus’ case, his story started off with him being the ignorant king of the recently plagued city of Thebes. While his introduction to the plague lacked a relationship with what he learned next in regards to the manslaughter of King Laius, it served as a considerable transition over to the topic. Although it took a very long amount of time to convince Oedipus that the more recent pieces of information that he had been told were in fact true, King Laius’ death which was at the hands of Oedipus signified Oedipus’ hamartia since he had realized that he was the murderer of the former King of Thebes, thus initiating Oedipus’ destruction and profound sadness. An example of an event that contributed significantly to the destruction of Oedipus was his efforts to curse the murderer of King Laius, ironically cursing himself. From this point on, Oedipus, the supposed protector of the city of Thebes, knew less about his city as a king should have, and it was at this point that the audience knew more than the