Compare And Contrast Napolf Hitler And Napoleon

Submitted By morganridgway
Words: 720
Pages: 3
Open Document
Adolf Hitler and Napoleon Bonaparte, both domineering leaders in history, have numerous similarities. They were accepted as monarchs in a previously democratic society for three major reasons: both countries were hoping for the returning strength of the monarchy, the populace was tired of inflation, civil war, and threats of invasion and both militaries preferred aggressive patriots at their head as opposed to any professional politicians.
What is history? History can be defined as the study of past events of our planet; especially pertaining to humans. A better question is, why don’t some learn from our past? It is obvious that history is constantly occurring; that is, events that have occurred will repeat in the near and distant future. There is simply no answer to the second question, for our species have been making the same mistakes since the dawn of our existence. We, as humans, are greedy people who seek power, control, and glory. The few who gain power often times attempt to take ownership of the areas they control. This has been seen through paramount leaders of our civilization. Two in particular are Napoleon Bonaparte and Adolf Hitler. While each is different in their backgrounds and ideals, their military expeditions and mistakes are one in the same; even if their events took place over a century apart. Each man grew up in different lives than the other. Napoleon grew up in a noble class that enabled him to join the army. Hitler grew up in a

poor home plagued by death of his mother and father. He also had to work to get into the army and serve in World War I. Following World War I, Hitler felt that Germany was treated unfairly by the Treaty of Versailles. This treaty blamed Germany, and stripped it of all its former glory. While they rose to power in different times, their reasons for doing so are fairly similar. Napoleon and Hitler both wanted to be leaders to give their country, what they felt, was rightfully theirs. Each man wanted to expand their country into an empire. Ironically, each man wasn’t actually of direct origin of the country they ruled. Napoleon was born in Corsica, an island in the Mediterranean Sea. Hitler was born in Austria, Hungry. Napoleon gained power through his hero-status of the war. While Hitler it through his Nazi party, making its way to the political and public eye. Once each man established themselves as leaders, they worked to pull their country out of economic hardship. Napoleon was able to balance France’s money supply, while Hitler got Germany out of the Great Depression. Napoleon sought to control the governments of other countries without necessarily having to invade and destroy them. Hitler, however, sought to extend Germany’s borders as far as he could.
Show More

Related Documents: Compare And Contrast Napolf Hitler And Napoleon

Hydrogen Atoms Bond Is Simple Essay

hydrogen atoms bond is simple because both atoms are the same. Also, each one has a single proton and a single electron, so the attractions are easy to identify.The example in which two hydrogen atoms bond is simple because both atoms are the same. Also, each one has a single proton and a single electron, so the attractions are easy to identify.The example in which two hydrogen atoms bond is simple because both atoms are the same. Also, each one has a single proton and a single electron, so the attractions…

Words 595 - Pages 3

Essay on Same Sex Marriage

Same Sex Marriage Same-sex marriage is a union between two individuals of the same gender that permits these two individuals to enter into a legally recognized marriage. In the US today, there is a big debate about whether gay couples have the right to marry. There are many reasons that people believe homosexuals should or shouldn’t have the right to marry. The United States was set up on an account of church and state being separated. For this reason Same-sex marriage should be recognized and…

Words 732 - Pages 3

Causes Of The United State Of America

I think the United State of America is heading to the same fate as the Roman. First, the election spend were expensive at the Roman Replulic election and it was one of the reason that they fall. Today the American election is costing too much money which is just smiliar to the same thing the Romans politican went through. Second, one of the fastest way at the Roman Republic to get rich is to hold a public office. In contrast to the American Republic politican these days start their election poor…

Words 1069 - Pages 5

Whether Australia Should Legalize Same-sex Marriage or Not Essay

not Australia should legalise same-sex marriage. It is a common thought that same-sex marriage could harm society, however legalising same-sex marriage will not disadvantage society in any way shape or form. If anything, banning same sex marriage fosters discrimination within society. Not legalising same-sex marriage also allows Australia to be viewed negatively when compared to other countries that have legalised same-sex marriage, also due to Australia depriving same-sex couples from the proven health…

Words 1014 - Pages 5

Advantages Of Same Sex Marriage In Hong Kong

should same-sex marriage be legal in Hong Kong? Different people have their own points of view, some people for the same-sex marriage should be legal in Hong Kong and some against it. In the below, I will talk about some history about same-sex marriage, why people support or against same-sex marriage and my points of view. Same-sex marriage means that two people of the same-sex get marry to each other. Netherlands was the first country…

Words 2012 - Pages 9

Essay Same Sex Marriage

Same Sex Marriage Kelsey Smith Baker College April 15, 2013 Composition 102 T Same Sex Marriage Darity defines marriage as, “the exclusive commitment of two individuals to each other nurtures love and mutual support” (2008, p 1). There are many definitions of marriage including ones that say between a man and a women, but this definition explains not only what marriage is but what marriage should be like. The definitions with the words man and women in it is a religious belief not one that…

Words 1436 - Pages 6

my best friend Essay

ideas are alike and share the same interest. This give the opportunity for the wants of the majority to oversee the rights of the minority. In the interest of men ambition must be made to counteract ambition; the checks and balance among the branches of government are impacted by this. Each branch hold individual powers for the governed but the other branches hold power to overrule decision made by one of the other branches if they are abusing its powers. This picks one branch from having too much…

Words 1185 - Pages 5

Essay about Same-sex Marriage and People

Kristyl Buttars 3/23/13 Draft # 3 Gay Marriage Some people argue that marriage is intended to bond one man and one woman and that the definition of marriage makes same sex marriage wrong. But everyone deserves to fall in love with who they choose, also the AAP say same sex marriages in kids best interests. On the flip side religion say one man one woman, and the IRS does not recognize same sex marriage on tax forms. For years now people have been debating whether or not a person can be born gay…

Words 676 - Pages 3

Mlk Speech And Doodle Alike

to the other ones are because the giver wants people to be equal and not be different, the MLK speech in like the others because MLK wants everybody to have equal rights and MLK doesn't want people to be on different levels. And in doodle they want everybody to be treated fairly and wants everybody to don't feel like they're not special. MLK speech is different because in the giver MLK doesn't want everyone to be the same like same clothes same hire he wants everyone to have the same equal rights…

Words 357 - Pages 2

Philonous Response To Hylas

‘two different perceivers never perceive the same thing’ (Adams, 79) follows from immaterialism. In Part A of this paper, I will clearly explain Hylas’s objection and Philonous’s (Philonous represents Berkeley’s position) response to this objection. In doing so, I will show how Philonous’s response to Hylas is more than adequate. In Part B of this paper, I will critically analyze what Berkeley (Philonous) is saying. In doing so, I will raise an objection one could put forth to the response that Berkeley…

Words 1291 - Pages 6