Swinburne thinks the design argument is the end all, be-all argument for Gods existence be only if we talk about it in the correct way. Swinburne recognizes the design but does not imply God but instead says that you have to presume God for it to work. The proof that he ultimately creates comes from the fact that he has identifies two types of order for the design argument, being Regularity of Spatial order and Regularity of temporally order. Regularity of Spatial Order being how things are ordered like books in a library or shoe sizes at a shoe store. This also relates to the design that can be explained by science and the thought that science will be able to explain everything someday. Regularity of temporal order being the laws of nature by Newton, Einsteinium Physics, or all math in general.…show more content… Temporal deals with the natural laws that always have a predictable outcome and cannot be debated which helped Swinburne a lot in his design argument. It is also said to believe that Thomas Aquinas is the one credited for coming up with with coming up with these orders which leads to why they rely on logic so heavily. The whole basis of these orders is to show that everything leads to its end goal which is ultimately God-like. Swinburne's proves this by saying that spatial and temporal order as well as all of us have free-will and our choices are not guided by the same principles are natural laws because no matter their outcome or end goal will happen. In conclusion Swinburne thinks this is enough to cover the design arguments but was willing to examine opponents arguments unlike
