Parthenon Vs Pantheon Essay

Words: 518
Pages: 3

Viewing both the Parthenon in Athens and the Pantheon in Rome I get very different feelings. The both look similar in construction and both are ancient structures that were ahead of their time. Both structures are grand in design able to accommodate large gatherings of people. The vast and wide areas are evident that major events took place in these ancient structures. Both structures are adorned with several pieces of art and details in the interior as well as the exterior. When we take a look closer at what makes these two ancient structures different and the purpose behind its conception, we can fully appreciate the uniqueness that these two buildings have from each other.

The Parthenon in Athens pre-dates the Pantheon in Rome by almost 4 centuries, an amazing structural accomplishment for it’s time. The Parthenon in Athens was built in the year 447 BC. The building itself is a large structure with artful stone columns as support. The structure is full of visual details such as metopes, pedimental sculptures,
…show more content…
This structure was built during the reign of Augustus in the years 27 BC – 14 AD. What is evident is the influence that Greek culture has had on the Romans when viewing the Pantheon. Even the names Parthenon and Pantheon are almost similar. Though Rome at one time conquered Greece, Heavy influence of Greek culture is displayed through Roman art and design. My guess is that this structure was used as a temple or church of some kind. Further research shows that the Pantheon, is a structural marvel that holds the largest unreinforced concrete dome. The Pantheon was used a a temple for the Roman gods as commissioned by Roman General Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa. The Pantheon displays structural and architectural advancement while using the tried and true architectural techniques of the