Pennlive's Rhetorical Analysis: The Legalization Of Gay Marriage

Words: 455
Pages: 2

Rhetorical Analysis Essay

PennLive Editorial Board in their editorial, The Supreme’s got it right - It’s no longer ‘gay marriage.’ It’s ‘marriage.’ and we’re better for it: editorial, implies that the Supreme Court made the right decision when gay marriage was legalized. Pennlive’s purpose is to further analyze why the decisions for gay marriage was the correct one. They adopt a dynamic tone in order to persuade in their adult readers.
Pennlive opens their editorial by stating that day when the Supreme Court's decision was made for gay marriage in all 50 states. They appeal to the logical side of the decision by talking about a little history when gay marriage was legalized, by vocalizing “June 26 just became a de facto national holiday for gay Americans-” and “With the Obergefell v. Hodges ruling, gay marriage becomes legal across the country including the 13 states that up until now had banned it.” They combine these facts with this editorial to enlighten the reader why they are writing this particular piece. This is filled with information that people cannot deny for they are straight facts.
…show more content…
The examples of texts appeals to the emotional appeal, by bringing up points such as “No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice and family.” This powerful quote proves in itself that marriage should not be segregated to just straight couples, that marriage is about love and living with the one you love. The amount of emotion put into the writing that Kennedy implied helped the Court to decide that letting gay marriage be legalized was the right thing to