Perils Of Indifference

Words: 645
Pages: 3

“The Perils of Indifference” by Elie Wiesel, and “On Women’s Right to Vote” by Susan B. Anthony are two speeches about human rights, which share similarities and differences. These speeches were incredibly powerful. Each author made the public aware of human rights issues, which forever changed our lives. In order to study these speeches, it is necessary to examine each author. Elie Wiesel was a holocaust survivor and later became a political activist. Susan B. Anthony was a social reformer who played a key role in the women’s suffrage crusade.
The most obvious difference between Elie Wiesel’s speech and Susan B. Anthony’s is the subject matter and the circumstances. Elie Wiesel’s speech “The Perils of Indifference” addresses the Nazi annihilation of the Jews within Europe. Susan B. Anthony’s speech “On Women’s Right to Vote” addresses the Women’s right to vote. Anthony speaks about having to remain silent for so long finally deciding to make a stand for women around the world. Wiesel speaks about how it took so long for people to realize that help is needed to stop the ravage killing of the Jewish people.
…show more content…
Elie Wiesel in his speech, ‘The Perils of Indifference” discusses how thankful he was to be saved by American soldiers. Susan B. Anthony expresses her anger because it took so long and so many sacrifices to have men acknowledge the lack of rights for women in the United States. In the Speech “The Perils of Indifference” Elie Wiesel was humble and happy about being in the presence of those who freed him and others like him. However, like Susan. B. Anthony, he was also disgusted that people let indifference cloud their judgement of what was happening to the Jewish