Persuasive Essay Boxing

Should Boxing be Banned

These passages present a discussion about arguments concerning the banning of boxing. This is an important debate for parents because the physical and psychological effects the sport may have on children. The two positions argue whether or not boxing should be banned. Both viewpoints have valid claims warranting consideration. For example, evidence indicates that boxing does not cause harm. In contrast, opposing evidence suggests that it does. While both sides of the issue have valid points, the claim that boxing should be banned is the stronger position, the position supported by a preponderance of the evidence cited in the passages. The most convincing and forceful reasons in support of this position are that boxing has …show more content…
To support this point, boxing is one of the only sports where the sole aim is to inflict harm on the opponent. Additionally, this violence is marketed as entertainment, exposing the true baseness of the sport.
In brief, boxing is a brutal, violent form of entertainment holding few moral principles near and dear. The counterargument that boxing should not be banned has a valid point.
For example, it brings joy to a large number of people, including boxers. This point, though valid, does not make the most compelling argument. The contention that boxing should be banned is the more cogent case. All things considered, it is reasonable that the points cited above persuasively support the position that there should be a ban on boxing, these points being that boxing has caused many deaths, it teaches young people to be violent, and it is barbaric. Why does it matter if boxing is banned or not? Since boxing has the potential to cause people great bodily harm, it should not be allowed to continue as a sport. This violent pass time should be banned because it directly contradicts the values of our modern

Show More

Related Documents: Persuasive Essay Boxing

Persuasive Essay Of Banning Boxing