Philosophy: Psychological Egoism Essay

Submitted By emaloney
Words: 758
Pages: 4
Open Document
Emily Maloney
1st Paper Assignment
2/21/14

While I Don’t Want to be Writing This Essay Right Now I am Because it Will Benefit my Grade in the Long-Run

It’s indisputable that all actions have consequences. So it can also be logical to assume that an individual acts upon possible personal repercussions: this is the basic idea of Psychological Egoism. James Rachels disputes Psychological Egoism with the basic notions that some actions are subconscious, our desires are ultimately good and satisfaction is just a result, we don’t always do what we want, or it depends on the desire. However, all actions are motivated by a value of self-interest; regardless if the interest is based upon physical or psychological satisfaction.
Psychological Egoism is theory of human psychology that states that each person pursues his or her own interest alone. Ethical Egoism on the other hand, while often times confused with Psychological Egoism, is the idea that each person ought to pursue his or her own interests exclusively and is in fact a theory of ethics. Rachels explores two main philosophical claims supporting the idea of psychological egoism: “the argument that we always do what we want to do” (65) and “the argument that we do what always makes us feel good” (66). Beginning with the argument that we always do what makes us feel good; Rachels’s first argument is that not all actions are done purely for the benefit of peace of mind, some are natural reactions to a situation. To prove this point Rachel uses the example of a child drowning and the initial motive would be “my desire to help the child” (68) as opposed to “desire to avoid a guilty conscience” (68). While initial decision of saving the child isn’t necessarily self-interested, the reasoning behind the action is. No matter the initial reaction to the situation it all comes down to why someone does something and the answer is either because they want to or that they feel they ought to. This is where the two arguments for Psychological Egoism begin to coincide: even if the consequence of a guilty conscience for not saving the child is not an initial thought for motivating the action, the fact of the matter is that you still did because you want to. Rachels’s second reasoning against this claim is that our desires are ultimately altruistic and that our psychological satisfaction is “merely a by-product” (68). Rachels is accurate in stating that a consequence of said “good deeds” are good feelings, but that doesn’t mean that they aren’t contributing factors as well. This outlook has the proposal that all self-interested actions will have negative effects on all others. This is not the case. Yes, someone who wants to rob a bank is acting based upon the theory of Psychological Egoism but so is someone who donates to charity in order to help starving Ethiopians; this proves that Rachels statement is indeed reversed, our desires are fueled by self-interest
Show More

Related Documents: Philosophy: Psychological Egoism Essay

Essay on Psychological vs Ethical Egoism

Psychological Egoism and Ethical Egoism: A Comparison Abstract There is a certain innate desire to help others, just as others will feel that same fulfillment for returning that aid. At the same time, however, there is also an inherent yearning to seek out one’s own best interest. This brings about a discussion regarding the difference between psychological egoism and ethical egoism. To understand the similarities and differences, one must first understand the two concepts including…

Words 1163 - Pages 5

Sociology: Morality and Psychological Egoism Essay

Tori Frigaard Philosophy 101 Professor Weaver Do we please or be pleased? Psychological egoism is the view in ethics that oneself is always motivated by self-interest, even in what seems to be acts of altruism. It is said that when people choose to help others or “do the right thing”, they do so ultimately because of the personal benefits that they themselves expect to obtain, directly or indirectly, from doing so. This is seen as a descriptive view as opposed to a normative view; it only…

Words 826 - Pages 4

Ethics: Paper Psychological Egoism

Introduction to Ethics Position Paper Psychological Egoism vs. Altruism It is to be understood that “ethics is the branch study dealing with what is the proper course of action for man” (Jeff Landauer, 2001). It may be concluded that ethics is the philosophical study of what is right or wrong, good or bad, in that part of human conduct for which we are responsible, excluding areas such as etiquette, professional codes, legal and religious codes. Many people raise the question: Is ethics…

Words 711 - Pages 3

phi 120 Essay

Chinh Quynh Do Philosophy 120/D108 Professor Simon Pollon TA Brittany French June 23, 2015 Psychological Egoism: True or false? In the article Egoism and Moral Skepticism, James Rachels discusses and refutes two arguments in favor of psychological egoism. One of them is that human acts are only based on self-interest. Rachels refutes to this argument, which is the best argument against psychological egoism, by showing its weaknesses and using counter-evidence. He argues that human actions…

Words 823 - Pages 4

Philosophy 241 Lecture Note Essay

alarm and opened the door). 2. Reminder: The Socratic Society (undergrad philosophy club) meets every Friday at 7 pm in Memorial Union (see TITU). Everyone welcome. The most influential philosopher whom I mentioned last time is Peter Singer (formerly Australia; now Princeton). He has several books, but the book that has had that greatest influence is Animal Liberation (I think in its 4th edition). When I teach Philosophy 341, I assign the chapters on factory farming and the use animals in testing…

Words 7807 - Pages 32

Are People Naturally Congenial Or Evil

egotistical and only charitable due to fearing God’s wrath (Kizer; Paine). Humans today primarily share prosperity because people evolved to become psychological altruists; however, some altruistic behavior is hidden egoism to avoid the judgement of fellow mankind. Psychologists study past human behavior to explain the present human condition as either egoism, “one ultimate aim: [one’s] own welfare,” or altruism, “benefits other organisms, at a…

Words 887 - Pages 4

Essay on katie s midterm for philosophy

Ring of Gyges, Psychological egoism Jeremy Bentham- Utilitarianism/ Greatest Happiness/Hedonistic Calculus John Stuart Mill- Utilitarianism/ Greatest Happiness Aristotle- Intellectual Virtue, Principle of the Mean, Moral Virtue, Teleology Immanuel Kant- Categorical Imparative/ Goodwill Epicurus- Ataraxia, Happiness, Epistemology John Rawls -The Two Principles of Justice Concepts Moral Philosophy (Also known as ETHICS)- is the study of morality using the methods of philosophy, and morality concerns…

Words 2696 - Pages 11

Distorted Idea of Evolutionary Psychology Essay

How many of the work had a distorted idea of what evolutionary psychology means? Evolutionary psychology studies the human’s nervous system such as brain structure, and individual behavioral differences. It studies the psychological adaptations that humans face regarding to the changes in physical and social environment. Evolutionary psychology tries to explain why humans act the way they do. It tries to find out problems that our ancestors’ face and how it became the way it is today. One of the…

Words 804 - Pages 4

Ethics Midterm Notes

society Definition of Ethics The discipline dealing with what is good and bad, with moral duty and obligation A set of moral principles; a theory or system of moral values; the principles of conduct governing an individual or a group; a guiding philosophy; a consciousness of moral importance A set of moral issues or aspects Reasons to study ethics Simple beliefs may be inadequate for complex issue The study can help a person sort out these complex issue, by seeing what principles operate in…

Words 3955 - Pages 16

Essay on Hobbes vs Hume

Prathyusha Guduru In the history of philosophy, two of the most prominent philosophers were Hobbes and Hume. Both made important contributions to the world of ethics. One of the main important things they differed on is reason. Hobbs felt that reason is way to seek peace but Hume felt the reason is only a slave to passions. In the following paragraphs, you will see how Hobbes and Hume explain their different views on reason the theories of the two philosophers are analyzed in depth, so that…

Words 991 - Pages 4