Police Profiling Tactics

Shots are heard a few minutes after a young black male falls dead on the ground. He was shot by a Police Officer on duty for acting suspicious, but it turned out that he was innocent and he had no illegal contrabands on him. Studies show that people of colour have a 80% chance to be stopped or frisked by police on a daily basis. Out of this percentage 30% have guns drawn on them ("Chapter One: Race and the Police"). Is this what the Government want?. Do they care for the families of people who fall victims to incidents like this?. Practising profiling tactics to minimise homeland violence is something I hugely disagree with. Police Officers sometimes use their power and authority as a way to ‘bully’ people, and this is common across America …show more content…
These people believe that it is the duty of Police Officers to do this thus they should practice profiling. If Police Officers think that the greatest threat is coming from a particular group of people they should do what they’re supposed to do and minimise that threat. A great example could be the terror attacks that happened in the country in past year. These people or so called terrorists were from the middle east, so if the Police feel that they face threats from that certain race they have the power to combat them. But little do people know that racial profiling by police is ineffective and will only make things worse. For instance profiling can have a multitude of effect on society. It weakens the trust between authorities and the communities they serve. Now with that being said, do you think a coloured person will report crimes they’ve seen or have clues to? No they won't. They fear that they'll become suspects of that case. A black person named Clarence Wesley, said, “I have little to no trust in Police officers after the recent shootings around the country, and these victims weren't even suspects.” He is saying this after he had a gun drawn on him by a Georgetown Police Officer for basically doing nothing. He has been in Georgetown for almost 15 years and this was the first time he has encountered an …show more content…
The "first wave" of widely acknowledged human rights are Civil and Political Human Rights, and advocating for political freedom and equal treatment before the law is not new to the human rights regime. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that racial profiling violates the constitutional requirement that all persons be accorded equal protection of the law. A study in Arizona shows that during 2006-2007, the state highway patrol was significantly more likely to stop African Americans and Hispanics than Whites on all the highways studied, while Native Americans and persons of Middle Eastern descent were more likely to be stopped on nearly all the highways studied. The highway patrol was 3.5 times more likely to search a stopped Native American than a White, and 2.5 times more likely to search a stopped African American or Hispanic . Although Native Americans, Hispanics, Middle Easterners, and Asians were far more likely to be stopped and searched than Whites on Arizona's highways, Whites who were searched were more likely to be transporting drugs, guns, or other contraband (“The reality of racial profiling”). Such encounters can result in negative behavioral changes. People may dress in certain ways or use other traffic routes to avoid interacting with the Police. Some people are humiliated in public by Police officers when being arrested or incarnated, and

Show More

Racial Profiling Essay

Arguments Against Racial Profiling Research

Police Brutality Papers

stop and frisk Research Paper

racial profiling 1 Essay

What Is the Word Essay

Forensic Lab analysis profile Essay

The Negative Effects Of Racial Profiling

Wk 1 paper

Stop And Frisk Case Study