Political Factors Of The Supreme Court

Words: 1512
Pages: 7
Open Document
The Supreme Court is currently the highest of the judicial courts in the country, with nine justices and judicial precedence over the existing courts in the nation. The Supreme Court Justices, court of appeals judges, and district court judges are nominated for their positions by the president, then judged and possibly appointed by the United States Senate. Being appointed by both the president and the United States Senate, there is possibility that certain factors may influence the decisions done by the Supreme Court Justices; it is debatable if the Supreme Court could be effective and an agent of social change. While there are different factors, the main two can be classified as legal factors, and political factors, where the other factors …show more content…
Those in favor of judicial restraint would be in favor of the elected branches, and embrace their policies, laws, and other actions. While the opposite side is the judicial activism, and while it is not entirely opposed to the actions and laws of the elected branch, it argues that the Court must have a strong hand in protecting minority rights, and interpreting the Constitution, even if it means overturning the elected branch’s decisions. Though some might argue that the two sides would prove ineffective, as public opinion is considered more prominent a factor in the Supreme Court’s decisions, yet that does not exclude a small rarity of cases that involved favor for unpopular …show more content…
Yet I still think that it can be effective, even in a society where conflict is important. While conflict brings up two sides, each one with their own points to their argument, they bring up issues that plague them, and or others. The Supreme Court allows them to speak their problems, each of the opposing sides getting a chance to voice their complaints and feelings in a controlled environment.
This allows their opinions to be publicized, considered by the people, and even if the court’s decision is faulty, the citizens can act up against it. Either it is by protests, or changing their vote in the next elections, the Supreme Court allows for social changes and Democracy by bringing issues to light. In a society where politically we grow by conflict, there needs to be a balance in each side of an argument debating on what they belief and feel. And although it may not be perfect, I believe the Supreme Court can be an effective agent of Democracy and social
Show More

Related Documents: Political Factors Of The Supreme Court

American Nationalism Dbq

the British in the War of 1812, which was an event directed America to enter the Era of Good Feelings, Americans started to identify themselves as “Americans” rather than divided inhabitors of specific states. Although Marshall’s ruling in the Supreme Court that reinforced the Constitution contributed to an increased sense of American nationalism in this period, American nationalism was bolstered by the demise of two-party system which temporarily terminated the conflict between the Federalists and…

Words 1546 - Pages 7

Judiciary's Weak Check on Bureaucracy Essay

weak check on bureaucratic power. Defining the Problem In 1776, the founding fathers created the Constitution of the United States of America and thus proceeded to build a government “by the people, for the people”. Within those documents, the Supreme Court of the United States was born with the task of upholding the laws of the nation. Those laws were created by representatives of the people sitting in their respective seats of the House of Representatives and the Senate. With each stroke of the…

Words 3687 - Pages 15

Legalization Marijuana Essay

1. Differences in political philosophy I. Federalists: (Democrats) Believed in the need for a strong central government. Believed that the central government would protect the citizens in a way that the states couldn’t or wouldn’t. Thought that this was the only way to create a country rather than just 13 states. II. Anti-Federalists: (Republicans) Thought most power must remain with the States. Feared tyranny like the British Monarchy would result from a strong central government. Said if they…

Words 3988 - Pages 16

Supreme Court of the United States and Sc Essay

“A political not judicial institution.” Discuss this view. (45) There has been ongoing debate about how political the Supreme Court (SC) is. The Supreme Court can be defined as the highest court in the USA which has nine unelected judges who have been approved by the senate and nominated by the president – The sole reason why it is seen to be political? Currently Obama has made two successful appointments of Sonya Sotomayor in 2006 and Elena Kagan in 2010 and hoping to make his third nomination…

Words 1606 - Pages 7

Florida Supreme Court Case: Gideon Vs. Wainwright

denied. In court, he became his own attorney by creating an opening statement, defense, arguments, and even declining his own testimony; but these efforts were futile, and he was sentenced to 5 years in prison. He soon filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus to the Florida Supreme Court on grounds the judge violated his constitutional rights, but the Florida Supreme court denied his petition. Gideon then filed for the United States Supreme Court, where they agreed to hear his case. The Supreme Court…

Words 1609 - Pages 7

Corruption In Political Campaigns

soft money as, “money raised outside the limits and prohibitions of federal campaign finance law” (Campaign Finance Law). Before the BCRA, political groups could raise as much money as they wanted under the guise of voter registration efforts, and then spend the money elsewhere (Fuller). Another major aspect of the BCRA was its ban on electioneering. Now, political organizations were forbidden from airing, “…ads that refer to a clearly identified federal candidate and are…

Words 1236 - Pages 5

Importance Of Judicial Independence

constitutional rights. Right to Constitutional Remedies, a fundamental right, states that every citizen of India can move a court of law in case of denial of its rights. This representation of courts as an institution of justice, free of discrimination and influence, seems to be withering. The loss of trust is not due to incapability of judges to make right judgments but because of political interference. There exists a nexus between judiciary, executive and legislative, which leads to screwed outcomes, favoring…

Words 1134 - Pages 5

Alexander Hamilton Federalist No. 78 Summary

responsibility. By extending the offices tenure it frees the office of judiciary from political pressures and prevents invasions on judicial power by the president and Congress. Hamilton admits, “the right of the people to alter or abolish the established Constitution,…

Words 504 - Pages 3

Criminal Jurisdiction in Indian Country Essay

Criminal Jurisdiction in Indian Country Tribal nations enjoy a unique legal position in the United States attributable to their sovereign status with built in powers of self-government. They also enjoy a special relationship with the federal government. In turn, this status and relationship has consequences for tribes and their members; for the states and their citizens; and the federal government. This paper will explore the significance of tribal sovereignty, the tribal-federal trust relationship…

Words 1343 - Pages 6

Supreme Court of the United States and Brandt the Judiciary Essay

Patrick Brandt Constitutional Basis for Courts • Constitution only creates the Supreme Court – others were established by Congress shortly after. • Congress can create “inferior” courts as it sees fit. Examples: District and Appeals courts, Bankruptcy Court, etc. • Courts are a primary example of federalism: courts exist at both levels and enforce the same laws of the nation (state and federal), and the laws of states (state courts). • Courts stand in a pyramid structure at the state…

Words 2527 - Pages 11