Prejudice In 12 Angry Men

Words: 930
Pages: 4
Open Document
Innocent Till Proven Guilty: Juror 8

What is prejudice? Prejudice is prejudgment, or forming an opinion before becoming aware of the relevant facts of a case Is this your own ? If it is a definition you need to cite it.. It is the judgments toward people because of gender, political opinion, social class, age, disability, religion, sexuality, race/ethnicity, language, nationality, or other personal characteristics (webster dictionary). We usually will act a certain way toward different type of people.. At the beginning of Reginald Rose’s play, “Twelve Angry Men”, the judge states, “it now becomes your duty to try to separate the facts from the fancy.”.(Act One: 1 ). The judge is basically saying that it is your duty to a trial that is fair …show more content…
In other words, the jurors should presume that the defendant is innocent until proven guilty. By interrogating the evidence the 8th juror exposes the inconsistencies and false accusation with the “circumstantial evidence”. His questions plant doubt in the jurors’ minds, and they begin to think about their own assumptions and biases. For example, the old man gave evidence that he heard the boy say “I‟ll kill you”(Act One: 26 ) from his apartment below and that he saw the boy running from the down the stairs from the apartment after rising from his bedroom.”(Act One: 26 ). The 8th juror points out that the old man assumed that it was the boy; the old man could not have heard the boy yell over the sound of the elevated train and hurried to his front door in 15 seconds because of his injured leg. This makes his evidence invalid and unuseful in the case.some juror even changed there mind to not …show more content…
And she, herself, testified the killing took place just as she looked out. The lights went off a split second later - she couldn't have had time to put them on then... I say she only saw a blur.”(Act Three: 69 ). After he points this out, Jurors 12, 10 and 4 all change their vote to "not guilty."

The 8th juror had the heart and the brain to go against the rest and expose evidence and falsation in some of the accusation to ensure that the boy had a fair jury and trial. He wasn't prejudice in the case in fact he was the opposite. He was open minded to the case and made sure he had enough info that the boy get a fair sentence. He change the prejudiced views in some of the jurors. The only prejudice I see in juror 8 was his belief in the burden of proof and his belief in the justice and its
Show More

Related Documents: Prejudice In 12 Angry Men

To Kill A Mockingbird Pride And Prejudice Analysis

The impact of prejudice and strict social conventions on characters in harper lee's to kill a mocking bird and Reginald roses twelve angry men are unfair to society and the individual as a whole. The social rules restrict interaction and treatment of equality to different social classes and races. This is shown in twelve harper lees To Kill a Mockingbird in the conviction and trial of tom Robinson were he was wrongfully convicted because of his colour and the social exclusion and demise of Mayella…

Words 1057 - Pages 5

Prejudice In Twelve Angry Men

trial. Due Process is central to the plot of “Twelve Angry Men” by Reginald Rose. In the story 12 jury members are faced with the murder trial of a young man, accused of killing his father. One of the purposes of the play is to expose the prejudices that are brought into the courtroom by a jury. In the 1997 the defendant is portrayed as a Latino man. It is revealed that he lives in the slums of New York. Many racial and socioeconomic prejudices that play into the jurors’ verdicts. Juror #10 often…

Words 581 - Pages 3

Prejudice In Twelve Angry Men

once said, “Prejudice is a learned trait. You’re not born prejudiced; you’re taught it. In the modern drama Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, the story tells about 12 jurors in a room together who are tasked with deciding the verdict on a murder charge against a 19 year old for murdering his father. As evidence and arguments come to light, the twelve juror’s personalities clash as they choose on this final verdict. Twelve Angry Men demonstrated not only that life lesson on prejudice during the text…

Words 743 - Pages 3

Essay about 12 Angry Men

Amy Porter Susan Blake ISC 210 Critical thinking 26 March 2015 Twelve Angry Men The movie Twelve Angry men directed by Sidney Lumet is about following the closing arguments in a murder trial, the 12 members of the jury must deliberate, with a guilty verdict meaning death for the accused, an inner-city teen. As the dozen men try to reach a unanimous decision. While everyone believe the teen is guilty right away all expect one juror. Making so they have to look at all the evidence again to reach…

Words 742 - Pages 3

Prejudice In Steinbeck's Of Mice And Men

Prejudice is seen throughout society today. Prejudice causes many groups to discriminate, and become racist towards that group that has a lot of prejudice against. Prejudice, today, is what society believes to be right or wrong. The characters from Of Mice and Men, By John Steinbeck, and Aristotle and Dante, By Benjamin Saenz, and 12 Angry Men, by Sherman L Sergel, all believe they are seen negatively by society based on prejudice they have heard. This prejudice affects all of these characters in…

Words 1135 - Pages 5

12 Angry Men Assignment Essay

the group in the film as they pertain to the problem the group is working on. In this film, the numerous functional and dysfunctional properties of the 12-jury men play a big role in analysing and evaluating the main purpose at hand, namely identifying the young man guilty or innocent for the murder of his father. The different roles the 12-jury men play in the deliberation of the capital murder case is prominent. Firstly, a role can be defined as a set of expected behaviour patterns attributed to…

Words 2006 - Pages 9

Essay about Mr MM goes to the MM

play "Twelve Angry Men", demonstrates the dangers of a justice system that relies on twelve individuals to reach a "life or death" verdict with collective states of minds hindered by "personal prejudice". At the beginning of the play, Rose explores the idea that doubt is a harder state of mind than certainty by portraying doubt, in the guilt of the boy, as a minority view within the courtroom. However, as the play progresses a seed of doubt is planted and the importance of self-prejudice hindering the…

Words 669 - Pages 3

12 Angry Men

The classic 1957 film, 12 Angry Men directed by Sidney Lumet examines the validity of the jury system while 12 men, brought together by chance, determine if the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The film depicts the importance and eminent effect of perception on our attitudes and behavior. It demonstrates the possibility of a near guilty verdict in one moment with a vote of 11 to 1, and in the next, transforming into a majority not-guilty verdict. With the life of a young 18 year old…

Words 943 - Pages 4

Rugmaker: Juror Essay

English Text Response – High ‘Prejudice is the only obstacle to discovering the truth in ’12 Angry Men’? Discuss Reginald Rose conveys a tainted society, where truth is contaminated by irrationality and ignorance, and justice is repressed by prejudice and egotistical motive. The fragile bias state of the American Justice System is exploited, and the warped, bigoted condition of society is exposed, as a 1957 New York jury is forced to decide the fate of a young, delinquent on trial for the murder…

Words 1258 - Pages 6

Twelve Angry Men Essay

Tweleve angry Men The movie Twelve Angry Man is a drama which was written by Reginald Rose and was broadcast as a television play in 1954. It became a successful film in 1957 which concerned the deliberations of the jury of a homicide trial. It was a strained debate between twelve gentlemen about an 18-year-old boy who was accused to kill his father guilty or not guilty. It was a really interesting and dramatic situation. In the movie, there are 12 men with different characteristics. However…

Words 560 - Pages 3