Proposition 3 Argumentative Analysis

Words: 524
Pages: 3
Open Document
In March 2015 a repeal was filed by Rep. Donna Campbell, for the residency requirement of one the Texas Constitution Amendments. Originally Proposition 3, also known as Senate Joint Resolution 52, required statewide elected officials to reside in Austin during their term in office. The Texas Legislature proposed a repeal to only remove the residence requirement, while other assigned duties remained as is.

Senator Kirk Watson was one of the supporters of the repeal for Proposition 3. He stated that there is advancement in technology and it wasn’t a need for officials to physically be in the branch offices. Voicing that people are now able to “telework”. Another defender of this argument is Donna Campbell the proposition author. Her comment …show more content…
Both opposing and supporting arguments raised valid points, which have my thinking neutral on the decision made. Depending on the frequency of availability needed for the position in office could make the approval an unwise decision. Yes, I admit that people should live anywhere of their choice but not at the expense of others. Professional athletes can’t expect the league to pay for traveling expenses if they live in another further city from where they work. Although the league covers the travel expenses for players to games they don’t cover the commuting expenses from home to work. As these professional athletes have to make sacrifices for their career so should the statewide officials. They understand the initial requirements for the job and could decide before accepting the position if it fits their life. Supporters are frustrated at the fact that other states don’t have this requirement. If they want to live in a remote location from their job, then it’s the official’s responsibility to take care of their own traveling expenses. Even if another city is not as costly to live in, it could be an inconvenience to commute frequently to the branch office. If the position doesn’t require them to be present all the time, then I don’t see an issue in approving the bill. Change is always good but I don’t believe in changing job description just to fit the employee, when they are aware of what they are signing up
Show More

Related Documents: Proposition 3 Argumentative Analysis

Essay Critical Thinking

include much more, we can say with certainty that it at least involves engaging in a process of critically questioning arguments. Therefore, to build a model of critical thinking instruction we might begin with our understanding of the simplest unit of analysis-the argument. What we find is that argumentation theory itself has undergone significant changes in the past 50 years. And while many of these theoretical developments have found their way into critical thinking lessons, the aim here is to present…

Words 1185 - Pages 5

Get Synergized Essay

Get Synergized (GSync) Who are we? We are professional allies dedicated to helping organizations (leaders and teams) increase the engagement integrity and alignment that make their work bigger than a game. Our services help you strengthen your ability to stay true to yourself and be a positive force in organizational life - however you define those. The result is better execution and innovation, and the ability to generate extraordinary value for yourself, your organization and the larger world…

Words 4178 - Pages 17