Pros And Cons Of Fighting In Hockey

Words: 800
Pages: 4

Why are people trying to take fighting out of the sport of hockey? Some might say it's because too many talented athletes are getting injured from fighting, or that it is really childish and unprofessional to fight. Although it is debated in the National Hockey League, also known as the NHL, and by medical professionals, fighting or the proper name fisticuffs among players should continue to be allowed.
The majority of NHL players, past and present, agree that there is a place for fisticuffs in the sport. Many of the players agree with the rule of fighting in hockey because they feel safer on the ice. Coming from Clark Gillies “A lot of times he'd have his back to you and if you wanted to take [Wayne Gretzky] out of the game it was there. One, I wouldn't do that to a guy it's just not my personality. I guess that the other one might be I would have to deal with the likes of Dave
…show more content…
Funding is essential in hockey because with players in alternative sports making a high pay hockey athletes demand the same or higher treatment depending on how much work the player puts into the team. Clayton Browne has claimed that the average National Hockey League (NHL) player in 2011 made an average salary of 2.4 million dollars (Browne). Also, fights have been proven to increase ratings and watching rates. This is proven by the 2018 Olympic men's hockey where fighting isn’t allowed, and only happens every four years had got a rating of 0.6 (Paulsen). In the NHL, where fighting is allowed there is a much higher rate of watching times. The 2015 Stanley Cup Playoffs got a rating of 3.2 (Statista). Funding is also essential for things like ice compressors, boards, goals, zambonis, players equipment and jerseys, stands, concessions, and food for the concessions. This does not including any selling or marketing items. Overall, hockey is expensive and the fisticuff matches contribute a help in