Pros And Cons Of Geoengineering

Words: 389
Pages: 2

In the second debate team one won but on initial thoughts with the information that was presented in the debate feels like a draw. The ones won the debate that geoengineering is an important way of trying to sequester the current CO2 build up in the atmosphere due to the burning of fossil fuel. They brought to attention that the current methods of green energy or reducing CO2 emissions is not working well enough due to the unreliability, political issues, and cost of sustaining the current energy market with renewable energy. There are various ways in which geoengineering can be more helpful to the environment over harmful. Examples include injecting particles into the stratosphere to reflect sunlight back and other ways of up taking carbon.