Pros And Cons Of Poaching

Words: 1198
Pages: 5

Over the past 40 years now nearly 52% of the Earth’s Wildlife has evaporated out of existence. It has met the requirement that it is hardly normal or natural. One of the species that had been wiped out of existence is the dinosaurs, the theory of the reptile’s (dinosaurs) death was that an asteroid hit the earth and killed them all, and this time that asteroid is us. Poaching is what made the 52% wipe out, not an asteroid, if the US continues to permit poaching then it will lead to the Earth to go out of balance, local communities to go rebellious, and it wastes an inordinately amount of money. Beyond the bounds of the disagreeing side, a partial amount of the society assume that it is tolerable for the poachers to keep on poaching and in some …show more content…
Nonetheless poaching is categorical, and stronger poaching laws should be made in all countries and states. The other route is to not have poaching be allowed because it messes with the earth’s balance, causes confusion with the local communities conditions, and wastes mass amounts of money. If we let poaching continue then we will be in a crisis, in messing with the Earth’s balance. Sure we can kill rhinos for their horns and use it for luxuries or traditional medicine, but it is still not ok. Even if you have horns for luxuries and want traditional medicine, it is still critically bad, and is causing poaching to continue. If we stop poaching then there will be a nice steady balance in the world that will keep it going for years to come. The number of rhinos poached in Africa has gone up increasingly, almost rapidly. “The number of species going extinct is increasing fast, at a rate that cannot be attributed to natural causes and it is clear that there is a human foot pressing down heavily on the accelerator pedal.” says, United Nations Environment Programme's Convention. (UNEP) “There were 1,175 rhinos killed last year, down from 1,215