Pros And Cons Of Representative Democracy

Words: 661
Pages: 3

Hi, I’ve been working on learning about democracy and monarchy for a month now.
I’ve been also trying to learn the difference between direct democracy and representative democracy. So let’s see the difference between these two governments. So direct democracy is a form of democracy in which people themselves, rather than elected representatives, determine the laws and politics by which they are governed. There are a bunch of citizens/ people who are in charge of democracy. They remain in charge until they are voted out, or they’ll die or they retire. They laws are made by the legislative branch and enforced by the executive branch. If the citizens are equality are ensured than they get to vote unless you’re 18 and higher that that’s equality. People in the democracy government have a voice about justice and freedom. The countries that have the form of democracy is France, Germany, India, Ireland, and Italy. A representative democracy is a variety of democracy founded on the principle of elected officials
…show more content…
A representative democracy is a pro because according to the text “people will have a ruler everybody will follow the rules sometimes.” People in the representative democracy doesn’t have to be a slave or a maid. People will be treated equally in the representative democracy. I think absolute monarchy is a con because in the text it states that “people in the absolute monarchy doesn’t have a voice or they are like slaves there. I think the constitutional monarchy is a pro because in the text it states “ people stay as the president or a ruler it stays like that until they voted out. That means people are free the people can do anything but nothing