Pros And Cons Of The Iran Nuclear Deal

Words: 571
Pages: 3

The international community will surely support the deal in the same ways Americans will. Simply put, the Iran Nuclear Deal handles the current state of affairs in a way which has a high reward (15+ years until Iran’s breakout time) and a low risk (any unlikely rebellion can be put down quickly by the larger and more advanced American forces). If rejected the other countries of P5+1 will feel alienated. Not wanting to feel that isolation after the hard work they put into the deal, all countries involved will surely be in support of it. The deal is not meant to only protect America because with all of the malicious forces in Iran today, the deal would be protecting the whole world of a possible nuclear war with those types of weapons in the hands of the violent Iranian government. Without this agreement put into place, Iran has a better chance of succeeding in a quicker development of nuclear weapons as it will not be checked that the country has abided by its terms. International support will surely be present when the consequences of not having the deal come into mind. The argument of opposers and supporters has two …show more content…
All of these consequences are more likely to happen without the deal. A fight is bound to happen as Iran can easily create nuclear weapons without America knowing causing not only a sooner breakout time, but also an undesired war that will cost many lives and a lot of money and resources. Once again a gang up on America is more likely to happen without inspections and military support in place to prevent it, and an unwarranted level of legitimacy is a highly unlikely consequence when the deal is carried out with organization and