Pros And Cons Of Voluntary Active Euthanasia

Words: 1022

Pages: 5

Open Document

Should Voluntary Active Euthanasia be legal?

Medical professionals are trained to provide the best care to their patients. They not only save lives but they do their best to honor their patient’s wishes. Voluntary active euthanasia is when a person ends in their life which can include refusing treatment or directly acting upon it. It’s based on a good easy death that honors the wishes of the parents. Voluntary active euthanasia should be legal in all 50 states in the United States. It takes into consideration of patients and their wishes. Act utilitarianism would grant that voluntary active euthanasia is acceptable. The basis of utilitarianism is creating the greatest good, for the greatest number in the long term. It’s focused on …show more content…
This principal stresses the idea of never harming patients but, treating them. If a physician is force abide by a patient’s wishes to administer active euthanasia this could violate it, “The principal may also be violated when no malice or intention to do harm is involved” (Munson, 933). Ultimately, the end result is death, which can be looked at as doing harm. So ultimately if a physician is forced to do so, they could be creating more harm than anything because the patients end result is death. The doctor should not be forced to inflict pain on a patient it results in making the physician also feel much pressured. In the film “A Death of One’s Own, Jim had a doctor who was very unconformable with physician assisted suicide which demonstrated that even if it’s illegal or legal, it can still make someone feel this way. Some people believe that it’s consider to be murder because the same result is death, However, if a physician keeps a patient alive against their wishes this could be harming them even more. In addition, someone is completely giving their consent and are fully aware of what will occur which means they have all of the information they need to make a successful decision. Euthanasia is not necessarily causing harm or is murder. Its respecting the decision of the patent

Essay on 28 Euthanasia III

Medical Ethics Handout 27 Euthanasia III Recall: Active Euthanasia – performing an action that directly causes someone to die. Passive Euthanasia – allowing someone to die by not doing something that would prolong life. The Difference Thesis – All else being equal, killing someone is morally worse than letting them die. Rachels grants that there is a genuine difference between acts of killing and acts of allowing to die, but does not think that there is an essential moral difference between the…

Words 1156 - Pages 5

The American Medical Association Essay

The American Medical Association holds that active euthanasia is impermissible, due to it involving the intentional termination of a human life by another human. Philosophers have argued for and against this stance, discussing the moral permissibility of such an action. James Rachels, a well-known contemporary philosopher, argues that active and passive euthanasia both require an action by the doctor. Thomas D. Sullivan combats Rachels’ view by looking into the moral significance of the intention…

Words 3857 - Pages 16

Euthanasia Moral Dilemmas Essay

ENG 102 Miles 5 December 2013 Euthanasia Moral dilemmas are always conflicting choices in everyone’s life. The constant struggle between what is right and what is wrong will probably never end when it comes to legal matters. What one topic of moral/legal righteousness is, would be Euthanasia, or assisted suicide. Not just assisted suicide, but doctor assisted suicide, or mercy killing as some like to call it for a darker point. There are types of Euthanasia, the opposing view to which it is…

Words 1611 - Pages 7

Euthenasia Paper 222

Since when did dying become a crime? An Argumentative Essay for Euthanasia Matthew Chrisman College prep English Mr. Wyborney October 30, 2013 Is it honestly a crime for one to die, or maybe even want to die? Even if this self-righteous death is achieved in a fashion in which most Americans today may not agree with, is it really up to the people around us to control how someone else should die? I strongly urge this country and its citizens to consider the possibilities of…

Words 1265 - Pages 6

Comes First Come First Serve Case Summary

Problem 1 1. For the situation given by Problem 1, Annas would argue for Mr. Cox to receive his surgery. The Reason he would agree with this based on the circumstance of the two surgery candidates. Annas would argue that the process has to be fair in which case first come first serve is somewhat applicable assuming we are not measuring value of Mr. Cox to the Biology professor. Annas wants efficiency, fairness and a respect for the value of life. If we were to value life equally from the janitor…

Words 1617 - Pages 7

Analysis Of The Hippocratic Oath

PHYSICIAN ASSISTED SUICIDE TERESA WATSON PHI 103Inform Logic PROFESSOR JASON LUM May 19, 2013 The Hippocratic Oath is the often invoked against the morality of physician involvement in deaths of patients. The oath declares: “I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody if asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect.” Numerous churches share the opinion of the American Medical Association that this kind of involvement in the death of patients is unacceptable for physic. (UIC…

Words 3054 - Pages 13