Purpose Of Sixth Amendments

Words: 2364
Pages: 10
Open Document
The Sixth Amendment was a part of the Bill of Rights, which was added to the Constitution in 1791. The purpose of the Sixth Amendment is to protect the rights of criminal defendants. One of the components of the amendment involves the right of defendants to be represented by a defense attorney which assists clients through the criminal justice process.

Heading: What is an amendment?

An amendment is a change; therefore an amendment to the constitution is a change or addition to the legal document. The power to alter the Constitution of the United States is derived from Article V of the Constitution, in which the congress shall propose amendments to constitute. In order to amend the Constitution, an amendment must be proposed by either …show more content…
Constitution is the part of the Bill of Rights that sets forth rights related to criminal prosecutions. The Bill of Rights contains some of the most vital and important freedoms guaranteed to U.S. citizens. The Supreme Court has applied the protections of the Sixth Amendment to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Sixth Amendment states that,

“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.”

Preeminent in the Bill of Rights is the idea that no one’s liberty can ever be taken away without the process being fair. A jury made up of everyday citizens, protections against self-incrimination, being informed of the nature of the offense for which one is accused, and the right to a speedy and public trial are all American ideas of justice. And so all of them were enshrined in the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, which became law when they were ratified by the states in …show more content…
As distinct English settlements, the laws governing the colonies by and large were based upon the contemporary rules of English common law. In England, however, the law held that a person accused of treason or a serious crime was to be denied the assistance of a lawyer in defending himself against his accusers. Colonial governments broke with contemporary English common law, and instead wrote into their statutes and charter a right to have the assistance of an attorney in any criminal case.
The Right to Counsel does and has protected citizens, but it wasn’t until the Gideon decision in 1963, where the Supreme Court held that the government would supply an attorney if one could not afford counsel, that the right to counsel became
Show More

Related Documents: Purpose Of Sixth Amendments

Gideon Vs Wainwright Essay

creating a federal constitution. The first ten amendments became an official part of the Constitution in December 1791. These amendments were written by James Madison because many states were complaining that the government had too much power. Madison decided to implement greater constitutional protection for individuals by limiting the government's power and restricting specific things. The freedoms guaranteed in the first, second, and sixth amendments limit the power of the government by giving certain…

Words 863 - Pages 4

Summary: Gideon V. Wainwright

Gideon v. Wainwright case by using the Sixth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment. Some people think that the U.S Supreme Court should have sided with Wainwright because the case was presented to a state-wide court which has different rules than a federal court. But, the Supreme Court sided with Gideon because it violated his fundamental rights as an individual and no type of authority should have taken his rights…

Words 1592 - Pages 7

Case Brief Essay

permit submitted electronically to the WSU police department, is not testimonial statement for purposes of the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause……………………………………………………………….. 6 B. The admission of the non-testifying laboratory analyst’s scientific findings through the in-court testimony of another laboratory analyst who did not perform the scientific tests does not violate the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause……………………………………………………………….. 7 CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………………

Words 1755 - Pages 8

DUNCAN V Essay

the side of the road. The Appellant knew his cousins had recently transferred to a school which had been reported the encouraged his cousins to break off the encounter and enter his car, and the Appellant was about to enter the car himself for the purpose of driving away with his cousins. The white boys testified that just before getting in the car the Appellant slapped Herman Landry, one of the white boys, on the elbow. The Appellant and his cousins stated that the Appellant merely touched the boy…

Words 621 - Pages 3

Essay about The Fourth Amendmet

American Government The Fourth Amendmet March 21, 2011 Amendment Number IV Amendment number IV was added to Constitution of the United States on December 15, 1791. This amendment gives the people of the United States protection from government agencies and other agencies from entering or searching their homes, and their own private property without a search warrant. Search warrants are obtained by a government official, in most cases a detective…

Words 2301 - Pages 10

Essay about Sociology: United States Constitution and Amendment

10 Amendments Preamble Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine. THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure…

Words 663 - Pages 3

Declaration Of Independence And Constitution Similarities

Although the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were written for different purposes, they are very similar. They have many things in common, talking about freedom for people. The Declaration of Independence states freedom for the people, by the people, not being biased, it shows the point of view from everyone. The Constitution states all the freedoms everyone has. Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence to bring to everyone’s attention of the bad the King was doing…

Words 483 - Pages 2

Pros And Cons Of Criminal Law

suspicion, which is below probable cause. If an officer has reasonable suspicion they may temporarily detain the person if they believe they have been or is engaged in criminal activity. They also may frisk with reasonable suspicion. The fourth amendment does not allow random searches on people of the public. An officer can’t randomly search you unless he has your permission or if he has reasonable suspicion or probable cause. After you have been arrested for a crime you must have your rights read…

Words 649 - Pages 3

Crawford V Essay

the risk to be charged with perjury or in contempt if the witness refuses to answer a question, unless it is protected by privilege. These methods are threatened by the way hearsay interferes and affect them. The Confrontation Clause of the Six Amendment states that “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right… to be confronted with the witnesses’ evidence against him…” The implication of hearsay evidence for this clause is explicit: If out-of –court statement evidence is admitted…

Words 1468 - Pages 6

Essay A Look at the Cases of Apprendi vs. New Jersey and Blackely vs. Washington

enhancement, rather they said if this is a fact that lead a sentence beyond the maximum and is not a prior conviction it must be plead and prove beyond the reasonable doubt. The issue is this cases is does the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment require that any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt?. Yes, the Court held that the Due Process Clause requires that any fact that increases…

Words 1310 - Pages 6