Quiet Lunch Argument Essay

Words: 562
Pages: 3

Teenagers and Adults, they both go to certain places to eat ,but now minors won’t be able to go to the restaurant ‘Munchy’s’ since they have sent out an ad discussing their new rules. The ad talks about the new rule called the “Quiet Lunch”. The “Quiet Lunch” states “From noon to 3pm, Monday through Friday, we will be a teen-free zone” this means that minors won’t be able to come to the restaurant on Monday through Friday, from noon to 3pm. The ad also discusses about other rules the restaurant has set like no cell phones, and no music. I think that minors should have the right to eat with adults at any time. .
The owners of the restaurant are making assumptions against minors/students. There are many assumptions made against students on the ad of the restaurant. One of the assumptions they made is that high school
…show more content…
Why does the restaurant make it seem like minors are the only ones making loud noises, messy tables, and have endless cell phone conversations when their are also adults that do that? I have personally seen many adults that have left very messy tables at restaurants. Adults are on their phone as the same as minors. The ad made it seem like adults leave clean tables, aren’t on their cell phone(Even though that's wrong), and aren’t noisy. In the news article “A Smart Idea Can Save a Business” it is with the banning of minors. How is banning minors a good idea? Minors pay a huge part in the sales of Munchy’s in October.
Minors want the same thing as adults to have a nice lunch. Excluding minors won’t leave student’s many other options to have a place to eat at. There are a few unhealthy restaurants in the town of the student’s and then there’s the school cafeteria. Come on now, who want’s to eat school food? Student’s don’t want to eat unhealthy food ,but they want healthy food like Munchy’s. Munchy’s is the only restaurant the students can go to if they want to have a nice