Re-Thinking Intersectionality By Jennifer Nash

Words: 440
Pages: 2
Open Document
Jennifer Nash’s essay, “Re-Thinking Intersectionality,” is an extensive critique of Kimberle Crenshaw’s theory on intersectionality. Even though Nash agrees with Crenshaw’s intersectionality analysis of having aspects of feminists and anti-race scholarship, race/gender binaries, identity politics, and exclusion of marginalized subject, however, she calls intersectionality a scholarly buzzword (p. 195). Nash’s critique is compelling. Nash presents a challenge to feminists and anti-racist scholarship to interrogate the concept of identity Crenshaw is arguing. Nash confronts intersectional scholars upon their immediate acceptance of the murkiness of interesectionality and offers four unsolved questions to ponder: the lack of a definition for
Show More

Related Documents: Re-Thinking Intersectionality By Jennifer Nash

Re-Thinking Intersectionality Analysis

Theorizing Intersecting Identities: The Introduction McCann and Kim introduce intersectionality like a kaleidoscope, a shifting prism of differences to examine the mobile and multiple configurations of domination in our lives (pg.163). In the 1980’s, an explosion of writing was recognized from Black women, women of color, and transnational feminist scholars that redirected the White hegemonic feminist theory. This chapter is an archive of challenging debates from various forms of scholarship on…

Words 919 - Pages 4