Reasoning Behind Assigned Seating At Lunch Analysis

Words: 702
Pages: 3

My friend told me," My friend was absent today, so I had to eat all alone." Teachers and other branches of the school council have majorly debated the effect that free lunch seating has had on students. One significant advantage of students is having free table choices because they can socialize. Another crucial benefit if students get free seats is they will get stronger bonds with friends. A final significant result is that classmates will be able to sit with friends rather than being seated with a bully.

First, students will be able to socialize with friends and get to actually talk to them for an extended time. The text, "The Reasoning Behind Assigned Seating at Lunch" states,"Lunch is the only time you can see your friends, and the assigned lunch takes that away." Said Tyler Bedoya, a.k.a. Fellow seventh grader Angelina Calvo-Ayers thinks that seventh graders are being treated as if they are immature." This proves that friendship can be crushed to ruins if the
…show more content…
According to the article, "The Reasoning Behind Assigned Seating at Lunch" states, "[Seventh graders] are old enough to pick who [they want] to sit with," she said. Many sixth graders also share the same thoughts as their seventh-grade counterparts." This proves that it is unfair to younger grades that older students get free seats. This is also quoting that they can't be [seated] with their friends. Another article, "Should Students Have Assigned Seats in the Cafeteria?," quoted,"Seats are switched up every few weeks, so students have to sit with students they might not normally talk to." This opinion has crucial points about how assigned seats can be stressful, and even embarrassing depending on who you’re seated with. Some opponents disagree with this, but proponents have crucial evidence of how free seating is better. Overall, students should be rewarded with optional seating throughout the school