Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men

Words: 830

Pages: 4

Open Document

“We always vilify what we don’t understand,” is a quote by Nenia Campbell that captures one jury member to a T. In “Twelve Angry Men” by Reginald Rose, a boy is accused of killing his father, and the final decision is given to a group of twelve jurors who are tasked with deciding if the boy is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Almost all twelve jurors have different points of views on the trial, and the discussions and debates brought out some not so good character traits in the jurors. Three is the villain of this story because of his undenying prejudice, his stubbornness to put his personal reasons behind him, and the fact that he ignored his duty to the justice system on purpose. Three is the villain of this play because of his prejudice against the boy that resurfaces from his past. For example, Three says in Act One, “It’s the kids. The way they are - you know? They don’t listen...I hate tough kids!” (Rose 21). This example demonstrates …show more content…
For example, at the beginning of Act Three, the jurors take a vote and discuss if there is any doubt in the case, and Three says, “You can’t ever convince me that there’s a doubt because I know there isn’t no doubt.” (Rose 47). This example shows that Three does not want to be convinced or shown any reason. His mind is set, and there is no changing it. This is important because it shows that Three wants the boy to be guilty, and ignores any other points made by the other jurors. Another example is at the beginning of the play. Nobody has even started to discuss anything yet, and Three has already started saying the boy is guilty. (Rose 11-12) This example shows that even though there has not been any discussion, Three already wants the boy locked up. This is important because Three is already showing his unwillingness to be open to other

Juror Number Five In Reginald Rose's 'Twelve Angry Men'

In Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose and Sherman Sergel, Juror Number Five starts to believe that The Kid is innocent because both him and The Kid grew up in a slum and he has had the same experiences as him, which have convinced his beliefs. In Act One, when the jurors are talking badly about slums, Juror Five chimes in and says, “I've lived in a slum all my life … There is something personal!” (Rose and Sergel 21). Juror Five starts to feel empathy for The Kid because he has shared similar experiences…

Words 416 - Pages 2

Corruption In Twelve Angry Men By Reginald Rose

Imagine being charged with a serious crime that requires a trial to take place to determine your innocence. If so, wouldn’t you want the jury deliberations to occur without any outside interference? Reginald Rose wrote Twelve Angry Men to demonstrate the values, strengths, and weaknesses of the American jury. Today, corruption is a serious problem. Many people are prosecuted because public defense attorneys aren’t dedicated to their job. However, there are many ways the American jury system isn’t…

Words 293 - Pages 2

The Twelve Angry Men Juror 3 and Juror 8 Comparing Essay

Comparison essay comparing Juror 3 and Juror 8 What are some similarities between Jurors 3 and 8? What about differences? Oh gosh, it's been years since I've seen the movie (didn't read the play). Okay, Juror #3 is the angry father, and Juror #8 is the guy who stands alone in the INNOCENT vote, right? I suspect the similarities are easier to find by reading the play because the movie really shows their contrasts. There is one similarity in that when they really believe something, they…

Words 1921 - Pages 8

Juror 3 seems simple - TAM Essay

At first Juror 3 seems to be a simple character, but is in fact the most complicated. In Reginald Rose’s “Twelve Angry Men”, Juror 3 seems to be a really stubborn, prejudiced, angry man, but in reality he is very experienced and has lived a complicate life. The play takes place in a jury room of a 1950’s murder trial where a young boy has been accused of the murder of his father. It follows the twelve jurors as the deliberate and discuss the case on the hot, stormy summer’s day. Throughout the duration…

Words 908 - Pages 4

Jury Duty In The Play '12 Angry Men'

7th Period 11/1/15 ACTION IN THE JURY ROOM Jury duty requires every adult to serve their country and judge their peers in life or death circumstances. The play, 12 Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, follows the story of 12 jurors, trapped in a jury room who are unable to come to a conclusion on an important court case. The seriousness of their duty and their obligation to listen to each other are key factors in the play that are…

Words 534 - Pages 3

To Kill A Mockingbird And 12 Angry Men Essay

How do To Kill a Mockingbird and Twelve Angry Men demonstrate that prejudice can effectively prevent the pursuit of justice? In the two texts Harper Lee’s novel “To Kill a Mockingbird” and Reginald Rose’s play “Twelve Angry Men”, both portray how racism, peer pressure, and prejudice can easily change the views and beliefs of others. In the texts, the authors show how the jury are prejudice, the way white people treat coloured people, and how both the protagonists in the two text are not affected…

Words 737 - Pages 3

Essay about Mr MM goes to the MM

the word “fairness”. In any situation, be it in a courtroom, at the work place or in line at the local store, we all want to be treated fairly. Set in the sweltering summer of 1954, Reginald Rose's socially perceptive play "Twelve Angry Men", demonstrates the dangers of a justice system that relies on twelve individuals to reach a "life or death" verdict with collective states of minds hindered by "personal prejudice". At the beginning of the play, Rose explores the idea that doubt is a harder…

Words 669 - Pages 3

Twelve Angry Men Essay

"Its not easy to stand alone against the ridicule of others". Twelve Angry Men is more than a play, it is a reminder of our social responsibility. Discuss. Twelve Angry Men is a legal drama, written by Reginald Rose during the heightened period of 1950's McCarthyism. The didactic play presents a cross section, examining 1950's America during a period of immense suspicion and uncertainty. Roses' play reminds us of the importance of responsibility and integrity, emphasising qualities such as courage…

Words 1237 - Pages 5

12 Angry Men Essay

Twelve Angry Men highlights the importance of seeing things from more than one perspective. Discuss. Reginald Rose’s play Twelve Angry Men emphasises the importance of seeing things from more than one perspective. Set in a New York jury room in 1957, Rose highlights how important it is that the jury discuss all of the evidence from the case in detail and from multiple angles. Representative of this notion is the 8th Juror who is willing to acknowledge alternative views or interpretations. From…

Words 986 - Pages 4

Prejudice In 12 Angry Men

social class, age, disability, religion, sexuality, race/ethnicity, language, nationality, or other personal characteristics (webster dictionary). We usually will act a certain way toward different type of people.. At the beginning of Reginald Rose’s play, “Twelve Angry Men”, the judge states, “it now becomes your duty to try to separate the facts from the fancy.”.(Act One: 1 ). The judge is basically saying that it is your duty to a trial that is fair…

Words 930 - Pages 4