Revenue Recognition Standards

Words: 1424
Pages: 6

intervene and override controls [Ball (2009), Crumbley et al. (2013)], while political and influential connections and practices influenced the achievement of fraud [Giroux (2008)].
Will the revenue recognition standard changes increase financial fraud? The research results revealed that the revenue recognition standard is the most challenging issues within the accounting profession, has gained priority treatment and focused from standard setters and regulators, has raised concern to all types of companies, management, auditors, financial statement users and preparers [Sridharan, Summers and Mcalum (2003), Marshall (2004), Srivastava (2014), Fazio and Johnson (2013), Weirich and Rouse (2000), Goel and Gangolly (2012), Sherman, Loseman and
…show more content…
However, as changes transpired impacting accounting standards, it opens the river of opportunities of revenue standard inconsistencies or complexities and regulatory weaknesses, later the accounting industry was flooded by motivated greedy and dishonest executives for their own personal benefits, props by personal rationalism of strong belief of oneself and the belief that aggressive earning management is ethical, until the landslide of fraud detection swift away companies and the accounting …show more content…
Eventually perpetrators end up hanging themselves as they become less careful and gaining the “gambler’s mentality”. Revenue recognition is obviously vulnerable and the easiest way to misstate or manipulate financial fraud among other item in the financial statements, the target and battle grounds of accounting problems due to its significance and as a core component of the financial statement. Evidently, the revenue recognition standards have gone through a boat load of different changes over time in response to past accounting