Revolutionary Changes In The Early 20th Century

Words: 1215
Pages: 5

In the early 20th Century and before, a worldwide revolution was taking place. However, it was more of a revolution of culture, and not politics. The rules of privacy, modesty and morality were changing rapidly. Huxley accurately depicts how the later industrial revolution left many questioning modesty and privacy in a newly interconnected world.
The expansion of transportation and communication in the early 20th Century, made affordable through mass production, brought revolutionary changes as distances grew shorter and privacy rarer. Huxley narrates, “God isn’t compatible with machines and science and universal happiness. You must make your choice. Our civilization has chosen machinery and medicine and happiness” (Huxley 234). He explains
…show more content…
‘Orgy-porgy…’ In their blood-coloured and foetal darkness the dancers continued for a while to circulate, to beat and beat out the indefatigable rhythm. ‘Orgy-porgy…’ Then the circle wavered, broke, fell in partial disintegration on the ring of couches which surrounded—circle enclosing circle—the table and its planetary chairs. ‘Orgy-porgy…’ Tenderly the deep Voice crooned and cooed; in the red twilight it was as though some enormous negro dove were hovering benevolently over the now prone or supine dancers” (Huxley 84). This scene quite obviously shows the increase in openness in sexualty, however, it also brings up an interesting connection to one of the very first scenes, in which the Director of the hatchery gives a tour of the room where human embryos are grown and conditioned, where the entire room is soaked in red light as it’s the only light the embryos can tolerate. The fornicating dancers are made infantile when compared to the embryos in their bottles. Infants are not expected to wait for the consummation of their desires. They care only of their impulses. These model citizens of the World State have been conditioned to serve only …show more content…
Huxley explains “‘For of course,’ said Mr. Foster, ‘in the vast majority of cases, fertility is merely a nuisance. One fertile ovary in twelve hundred— that would really be quite sufficient for our purposes. But we want to have a good choice. And of course one must always have an enormous margin of safety. So we allow as many as thirty per cent of the female embryos to develop normally. The others get a dose of male sex-hormone every twenty-four metres for the rest of the course. Result: they're decanted as freemartins - structurally quite normal... but sterile. Guaranteed sterile. Which brings us at last,’ continued Mr. Foster, ‘out of the realm of mere slavish imitation of nature into the much more interesting world of human invention” (Huxley 4). This is a perfect illustration of how the World State controls by controlling fertility. During this time there was a delusional fear in western nations over the onset of socialism, which perhaps even Huxley experienced. This is reflected in this illustration of the World State, which is a government so predominate it controls every aspect of a person’s life, directly or indirectly, even down to each individual's social