Rhetorical Analysis

Words: 1130
Pages: 5

When you compare two articles that discuss two different topics, it is imperative to note that, they may share rhetorical features and strategies which work towards the goal of conveying information to a specific audience. For example, the articles, Creative Rights for Writers of Theatrical and Long-Form Television Motion Pictures, explains the basic laws and rights for writers working in the film industry. A fresh perspective from immunologists and vaccine researchers: Active vaccination strategies to prevent and reverse Alzheimer’s disease, is an article that discusses possible cures for Alzheimer's Disease. The article, “Restore and Improve Urban Infrastructure,” is more of an argumentative essay that discusses the problems and possible …show more content…
This program was created to make writers working for the entertainment aware of their creative rights. The reader can infer, just by reading the title, and considering the background behind the creation of this article, it is discussing about the creative rights that a writer has, whether it is for publishing a book, releasing a movie, or other methods of publishing in entertainment media. When observing the context factor, the author discusses the basic rights, while also exploring previous events that have happened, leading to the development of creative rights. For example, “The PBS Agreement,” which the article states, “establishes substantial and enhances creative rights for writers of public television programs” (WGA, 6). The author uses the conclusion as an opportunity to advertise for the WGA program, explain the importance of protecting these current laws, and to also encourage readers to join their organization. Compared to the other articles, this one is considered the most simplistic. The article is considered simplistic due to the author’s writing style of stating facts, rather than expressing …show more content…
National Library of Medicine. The article was written by molecular scientist Agadjanyan MG, and Ghochikyan A, and vaccine researcher, Petrovsky N. When considering the captive audience for this article, it is clear that the authors targeting those studying the medical field at an academic level. To summarize the article’s context, the authors examine medical research over Alzheimer’s Disease. Alzheimer's Disease is a terminal sickness, most common in people over the age of 60, that destroys memory along with other important mental functions. While it has been stated that Alzheimer's Disease can be treated, there is supposedly no cure for the illness. The purpose of this article is to argue that there is, in fact, a possible