Rhetorical Analysis Of Organ Sales Will Save Lives

Words: 720
Pages: 3

In the article, “Organ Sales Will saves Lives” Joanna Mackay wrote about how she would legalize organ donations. Mackay states that this day in time people use dialysis, which is harsh, expensive, and only temporary. Mackay had been making it her own personal goal to where it would be possible to legalize organ donating so that the person who is choosing to donate organs would have more rights when beginning to do this process. When beginning to read the article, it was very easy to come across how many rhetorical devices that are in the paper such as; logos, ethos, pathos, and procatelepsis.
The overall goal should always be to save lives; therefore organ donations should be available to all people. With that being said, dialysis is only temporary and there needs to be a better option that is a more permanent
…show more content…
Some people would rather take the risk of donating organs simply because when they do, they notice that they are saving some else’s life, sure, most of the time the donor never finds out who receives the organ they had donated but it is the thought that really matters of them possibly saving someone else’s life. Although, finical gain from the sale of another kidney can easily save one life, because people will do anything for money as long as they are aware that they can live with one kidney. “While there may seem to be a shortage of kidneys, in reality there is a surplus. In third world countries, there are people willing to do anything for money” (Page 3, Para 1). Therefor, the author provides argument that people should have the capability of donating because it is there right. Most people believe that as long as it is your body, you can do as you wish, get piercings, tattoos, and donate organs. How can we take it away from them when people have a