Rhetorical Analysis Of Supersize Me

Words: 1221
Pages: 5

What would happen if someone went on a strict diet of nothing but fast food meals from McDonald's? In Supersize Me, Morgan Spurlock attempts to answer that question while making an argument about the effects and dangers of consuming excessive amounts of fast food. Spurlock asserts that the fast-food industry is the main cause obesity epidemic that is plaguing the nation. In attempt to persuade his audience to agree with his main claim Spurlock refers to the three main rhetorical appeals: logos, ethos, and pathos. Even before Spurlock's views of the rhetorical appeals in his documentary, it is important to consider the audience, the author, the constraints of the argument, and the exigency of the argument. Spurlock directs his argument …show more content…
Appeals to logic can be made in the form of Statistics, numbers, and phrases. In the documentary Supersize Me, logos is presented to the audience through the medical assistance, testing, and analysis from several doctors. Spurlock frequently goes to these doctors over the month of the McDonald's bingeing to test his weight, blood sugar, fat, cholesterol, and liver function. The results from the 30-day binge that Spurlock went on showed a profound effect on his body. Testing concluded that within just 30 days Spurlock gained 24 and a half pounds, a 13% body mass increase, cholesterol that skyrocketed, as well as very noticeable changes in mood. Logos is the very key in this documentary to persuade the audience by giving factual, scientific details. Through logos, the results are seen in numbers and able to be put down in the form of data and statistics. Spurlock’s weight gain, cholesterol levels, body mass increase, and many other nutritional factors are all able to provide clear results that are the outcome of the 30-day consumption of McDonald's. These results are used to further persuade the audience of the dangers of the fast food industry and its products on people's