Rhetorical Analysis On Elie Wiesel

Words: 686
Pages: 3

Elie Wiesel went through an inhumane oppression during his lifetime, more specifically his childhood. Wiesel lived in the infamous concentration camp Auschwitz, where he and his father endured suffering unlike any other. Wiesel’s father stayed neutral to the Nazi invasion, as well as people outside of his country staying neutral to what is happening to him and other helpless souls. Wiesel knew personally what it was like to not receive help, and wished to urge others to help people in situations like he was in. This is what Wiesel’s speech is about, helping people in need, and not staying neutral towards their situation. Although some may argue that sometimes people just need to stay out of other’s conflict because it is not their business, Wiesel says that people need to take action when they see something wrong because neutrality only helps the …show more content…
This obviously changed Wiesel into becoming an activist for wanting to help the oppressed, and urge others to help them as well. Wiesel says in his Nobel Prize acceptance speech, “When human lives are endangered [...] the center of the universe.” Wiesel wanted to show the free and independent that when they, a loved one, or even a stranger are suffering, all separations and borders become meaningless. The U.S and Russia did not care how they got to and destroyed Germany, only as long as they annihilated the Nazis. Borders and obstructions became meaningless to them. Soldiers did not sit down and brush off the situation that others like them were trying to prevent. Wiesel wanted to embed that same courageous feeling and focused mindset into every person he met, as to stop them and other people from going through the pain he endured at Auschwitz. Wiesel wants only the best for people, and to show them why they need to sympathize with the oppressed, discouraged, and hurt citizens of the same world they live