The reason I believe this needs extra attention is because a common feedback I got was that my rhetorical choices did not always go back to the reason of why MacNeil wrote this article. I need to make it clearer and explain it in more detail, so the point comes across easier.
The way that I plan on fixing this is by looking at each of the examples I used and see what kind of analysis, if any, I did. While doing thing on a physical copy I will write a basic interpretation of what I want to say and then later form it into a sentence that will connect my rhetorical choice example to how and why it makes the audience feel the way they do.
Another thing that needs attention are the way certain sentences are structured, they need to be formed better to make more sense. The reason this needs to be fixed is because it was brought to my attention that a lot of the sentences I wrote were hard to read and had a fair amount of grammar mistakes. So it is important that I fix this to make it more