Rhetorical Appeals In Julius Caesar

Words: 1471
Pages: 6
Open Document
Julius Caesar Research Assignment Rough Draft Some wars can be won with words alone. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, two men make their pleas to the people of Rome using a variety of rhetorical appeals. One man seals his fate as the leader of Rome and the other man seals his fate to death. Mark Antony and Brutus both win the support of the people, but Antony wins the day because of his use of pathos to sway the people. Brutus speaks to the people first, desiring to explain himself to the people of Rome and then he allows Mark Antony to address the people. Brutus comes to the people already having a very powerful tool: ethos. The people of Rome consider Brutus the most honourable man in Rome and the crowd does …show more content…
He shifts from focusing on his honor alone to logically explaining his actions. He states “ had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men,” explaining that he believed Caesar posed a threat to the Democratic Republic of Rome(3.2.23-25). The people value this freedom so while this is logos and ethos one could argue for pathos as well. Brutus believes that Caesar was too ambitious and says “ as he was ambitious I slew him,” giving this as a reason for slaying him(3.2.27-28). He then makes another emotional appeal to the people asking them to speak if he has offended them, he then uses aposiopesis and waits for a reply. Antony also undergoes a shift in the middle portion of his speech. He begins to drive home the point, the men are not honourable for killing Caesar and uses pathos to do so. Antony plants the seed for mutiny, rage, and the will early, and he continues to water it so it blooms later on in the play. He uses paralipsis when he states “ if I were disposed to stir your hearts to mutiny and rage I should do Brutus and Cassius wrong”(3.2.113-115). Antony solely focuses on moving the people's emotions by appealing to their pathos. He ends the middle portion with a metaphor and the showing of Caesar’s body and says, “Look you here,/ Here is himself, marr’d, as you see, with traitors”(3.2.173-174). Brutus adds new …show more content…
Brutus comes to the end of his speech and it seems as if he has won the crowd. He tells the people he has “the same dagger for (himself), that it may please (his) country need (his) death,” and the people go wild(3.2.47-48). Then, Brutus messes up in a big way, he asks “for my sake stay here with Antony,” which turns out to be a catastrophic mistake. William Fleming says ‘Brutus, conscious of his own purity and nobility of motive, is blind to the peril (and) he assents to the request,” giving Antony the opportunity to speak to the people and show them the body(Fleming 32). Brutus ends up using his own ethos to ask the people to stay and listen to Antony call him a traitor to the very country he acted for. He wins the day with his ethos and logos but ultimately loses it before it has even started. In contrast, Antony uses the end of his speech to convince the people to rise to mutiny. Antony states “Here was Caesar! When comes such another,” to end his speech(3.2.208). After this line, the people rise to mutiny and seek to kill the traitors. Antony has accomplished his goal and can see the power he will have in the future coming into fruition. It is ultimately Antony’s pathos that wins the people over and convinces them to do what he asks them to do. Both men use a variety of rhetorical appeals in their funeral speech. Krystyna
Show More

Related Documents: Rhetorical Appeals In Julius Caesar

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, the power of persuasion takes center stage as Mark Antony and Brutus address the Roman crowd in the aftermath of Caesar's assassination. Through the use of rhetorical devices such as repetition and rhetorical questions, Antony strives to sway the people's opinion regarding the conspirators. Meanwhile, Brutus employs his own rhetorical ability to justify the assassination, relying heavily on appeals to ethos. These speeches provide a fascinating study of the…

Words 835 - Pages 4

Antony's Ethos In Julius Caesar Essay

In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Antony uses the rhetorical appeal ethos to persuade the Roman people to turn against the conspirators. Brutus has just finished his speech at Caesar’s funeral and turned the people of Rome against Caesar. Antony is starting his speech, beginning to turn the Romans against Brutus and the conspirators by stating “ Come I to speaking Caesar’s funeral, he was my friend, faithful and only to me” (84- 85). By being at Caesar’s funeral and reminding everyone how…

Words 408 - Pages 2

Eng 103 Research Paper Outline

Hua 1 Lina Hua Professor Lamas English 103 21 May 2014 Marc Antony’s Funeral Oration Julius Caesar , one of Shakespeare’s most renowned plays, is set in ancient Rome around 44BC during a time period when the Roman Empire was expanding and rising in power as well as in political discord. In the play Rome is afflicted with constant internal conflicts of leadership between power­hungry Senators and ambitious military leaders. Continuously plagued with self­serving competitors and underhanded betrayals of allegiance…

Words 1694 - Pages 7

Julius Caesar Essay

tongue to be a weapon to smite his enemies. This ability to use words as weapons is one Marc Antony uses to turn the tides against Brutus. In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, two of the most famous and profound speeches of all time were crafted by Marcus Brutus and Marcus Antonius on the day of Julius Caesar’s death. Marc Antony and Brutus are both dear friends of Caesar, but they stand on opposite sides of this impromptu funeral match. William Shakespeare took what information he could from Plutarch’s earlier writing and used it to bring about his own…

Words 1353 - Pages 6

Brutus Use Of Manipulation In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

manipulation. He appeals to the crowds in two techniques known as ethos and logos. He was basically trying to persuade using logical reasoning. “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” (Julius Caesar) He uses logos in this certain case to give logical reasoning of why he killed Caesar. Caesar was a great person, but Brutus loves Rome more than anything else. “Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” (Julius Caesar) This was…

Words 583 - Pages 3

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar Essay

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is about a man who is betrayed by his trusted friends because they accuse him of being ambitious. Caesar is betrayed by Brutus, Cassius, and Casca because they were afraid he was going to become a tyrant and was not good for Rome. This view, however, is not shared by one of his good friends, Antony. After Caesar is killed by Brutus, Brutus addresses the crowd and says why he killed Caesar, appealing to his credibility…

Words 1001 - Pages 5

Essay about Honourable Me and an Ambitious Dictator

works is The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. From its earliest extremities, some citizens are displeased with the Great Roman Dictator Julius Caesar. Of these citizens is a group of men, respectfully called the “Conspirators.” These men want nothing more to end Caesar’s life and his reign, in order to recover their beloved Rome. The leaders of this faction are Marcus Brutus and Caius Cassius. In Act 3 of this play, Servilius Casca, or simply Casca, was the first to attack Caesar in the Roman Capitol. At…

Words 846 - Pages 4

Brutus And Antony's Use Of Rhetorical Devices In Julius Caesar

In the Play “Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare, Both Brutus and Antony try to persuade the crowd at Caesar’s funeral by using different rhetorical devices. Persuasion is process aimed at changing a person's or a group's attitude or behavior toward some event, idea, or object. In this case, it is at Caesar’s funeral. This process is applied by using written or spoken words to convey information, feelings, or reasoning, . Using ethos, pathos, and logos, they both tried to change the crowd's attitude…

Words 328 - Pages 2

Trajedy of Julius Caesar Essay

of Wisdom: A Rhetorical Analysis of Antony’s Speech After hearing lie after lie from Marcus Brutus, Mark Antony addresses the people of Rome in an ironic manner implying that Brutus lies. When speaking to the people of Rome, Antony creates havoc amongst the crowd over the truth behind Julius Caesar’s death. Antony opens his speech by justifying his reason to address the people of Rome. Antony uses antithesis to address the people of Rome of his intention: “I come to bury Caesar, not to praise…

Words 718 - Pages 3

Essay on Luke Julius Caesar

the truth.” Composers inevitably manipulate the exhibition of meaning and perspective via an amalgamation of linguistic and textual form to provoke an interpretation of deliberate bias, as typified within William Shakespeare’s timeless tragedy Julius Caesar (1599), Oliver Stone’s conspiracy driven film JFK (1991), and the provocative feature article Poisoning the truth by Mariane Pearl (AWW, April 2008, pp 85-88). Thus the nature of conflicting perspectives is a dialectical relationship between collective…

Words 1075 - Pages 5