Rhythm National Analysis: Interpretation Of Music

Words: 638
Pages: 3

Music is different, powerful and open to interpretation. We as humans, can hear the same type of music as the person sitting right next to us, but have completely different interpretations of the sounds. For some, we love it right away and instantly feel attached to it. There is something about it, something that makes our minds drift elsewhere and our bodies tingle with joy. But just as one human can fall in love with the sound, another can instantly be turned off by it. We can’t explain it completely, but the Rhythm National Analysis gives us a better understanding of what we as humans like and don’t like, and what that “something” is. The first point that I found incredibly interesting was the responses to how close soul and country really are. The choices the participants were gives was one mile, ten miles, 100 miles, or 1,000 miles. Interestingly enough, only ten people said they were pretty much the same genre (or one mile apart). Even more interesting is the fact that of those ten people, nine were white/Caucasian and six out of the ten said they are from a suburban area. This leads me to believe that your background has a huge part to do in what music you like, and what music you are accustomed to. Because these nine people have a very similar background, it makes sense that they feel the same about their musical taste. The second thing …show more content…
This makes sense to me, because even in class we are having trouble defining country. I would argue that country music is going through an identity crisis right now, and people aren’t quiet sure of a concrete definition of what “country music” is. By far the clear and away winner was “twang” or “twangy”, appearing 19 times or 10.7%. This to me means that our class doesn’t exactly know what country music is, we just know what it should sound like and that is a singer with that southern accent and way of singing. That to me is incredibly