Roe V. Wade Case

Words: 1244
Pages: 5

Roe v. Wade is arguably the Supreme Court’s most controversial ruling, stirring up countless discussions as to whether or not the U.S. Constitution embraces a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy by abortion, and these arguments reached their pinnacle after this case. When talking about abortions, a debate is nearly always brought back to one’s interpretation of the Due Process Clause, and what, if any, Substantive Due Process rights are stemmed from this section of the 14th amendment. Throughout this paper I will be discussing how the Roe v. Wade case began, why it made its way to the Supreme Court, how the Supreme Court handled the case, and which sections of the Constitution embrace a woman’s right to a patient-physician relationship, unabridged by Government or State interference, to pursue and legally conduct an abortion.
During the time when Roe v. Wade was taken to district court, the Texas constitution only allowed an abortion by “medical advice for the purpose of saving the life of the mother” (“Roe v. Wade”). A woman, introduced by the Court as Jane Roe, later identified as Norma McCorvey, claimed that she was pregnant but unmarried and wished to
…show more content…
Constitution does support a woman’s right to choose an abortion, it does so indirectly. To expound, the U.S. Constitution does not unequivocally support a woman’s right to terminate her pregnancy by abortion. However, 14th amendment to the U.S. Constitution does support a woman’s right to personal liberty, which includes her right to privacy from the state and government. This personal liberty is one of the criteria that entitles a woman to have medical discussions with her licensed physician which can lead to a request being approved by that woman’s personal physician to have an abortion, depending on her trimester, health, etc. In other words, a woman does have the right to seek an abortion, but these rights are not unlimited. So what are some these