Rorschach Test

Words: 685
Pages: 3

Psychology is a field in which we attempt to scientifically unlock our minds and their functions. It is the field of many great thinkers and consequently, many interesting theories. However, not all of these theories are entirely valid. This is extremely prevalent when researching personality. In looking at the projective tests, where participants respond to obscure events or objects, we can truly see how even with a good strategy, it is important to look at the results of a study. Personality assessments are used to try to identify a specific person’s behaviors and why it is they do those things. The goals with the projective tests are to try to identify personality traits and the inner feelings of the subject. Three tests that try to accomplish this goal are the Rorschach test, the house-tree-person test, and the Thematic Apperception Test. The Rorschach test is seemingly obvious to combat, as so many have already done just that. Benjamin Radford (2009) believes, “The test has remained in use more out of tradition than good evidence.” He is a big opponent of the Rorschach test and argues it should not be protected because “the test is worthless at diagnosing …show more content…
This is evident in Gestalt psychology, as Max Wertheimer’s view that the whole is more important than the little things that make it up, directly combats Wilhelm Wundt’s view of Structuralism. When certain psychologists disprove or contradict others, it is important to not ignore the one you like less. This is even true for Sigmund Freud. Although many of his theories have been disproved, they are not worth totally ignoring. After all, he did “shake the foundations of human thought by showing that we are not as important or powerful as we’d like to think” (Horan, 2008). Even the projective tests serve a purpose in creating a beginning to analyze patterns in people’s observations related to their