Analysis of Contemporary Health Care Issue 1
Less Than Satisfactory
70.0 %Content 40.0 %Apply the Issues of Profit vs. Not-for-Profit, Perspectives and Responsibilities, and Rules and Regulations to the Chosen Health Care Issue
Does not demonstrate an understanding of the business concepts involved in the issue, including the implications. Does not address the three requirements specified in the assignment. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the situation, and does not develop effective answers to the questions, with rationale.
Demonstrates only minimal understanding of the business concepts involved in the issue. Only minimally addresses the three requirements specified in the assignment. Demonstrates only minimal abilities for critical thinking and analysis of the case study, and develops weak answers to the questions, with minimal rationale
Demonstrates knowledge of the business concepts involved in the issue, but has some slight misunderstanding of the implications. Satisfactorily addresses only one of the three requirements specified in the assignment. Provides a basic idea of critical thinking and analysis for the questions, answers, and rationale.
Demonstrates acceptable knowledge of the business concepts involved in the issue. Satisfactorily addresses only two of the three requirements specified in the assignments. Develops an acceptable response and rationale for it. Utilizes some examples.
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of the business concepts involved in the issue, and their implications. Satisfactorily addresses all three of requirements specified in the assignments. Clearly answers the questions and develops a very strong rationale. Introduces appropriate examples.
30.0 %Integrates Information from Outside Resources into the Body of Paper
Does not use references, examples, or explanations.
Provides some supporting examples, but minimal explanations and no published references.
Supports main points with examples and explanations, but fails to include published references to support claims and ideas.
Supports main points with references, explanations, and examples. Application and description is direct, competent, and appropriate of the criteria.
Supports main points with references, examples, and full explanations of how they apply.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague. Purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Lacks sufficient justification of claims. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.