Ryle's Argument For Behaviorism

Words: 463
Pages: 2
Open Document
The definition of behaviorism is the theory or doctrine that human or animal psychology can be accurately studied only through the examination and analysis of objectively observable and quantifiable behavioral events, in contrast with subjective mental states (Dictionary). Many philosophers and researchers have different opinions on behaviourism. Some believe that the mind is unknowable and others believe that there is no mind and behavior is all that matters. But Ryle’s argument of behaviorism is appealing. Ryle’s argument for behaviorism focuses on a logical type of behaviorism. According to Ryle’s argument there was no mental causation. His aim in The Concept of Minds was metaphilosophical, he tends to set scenarios to explain the philosophical method he uses. In The Concept of Mind, Ryle is trying to …show more content…
My objection towards Ryle argument for behaviorism is that one’s mind set is very important. People think and behave according to their current situation. I believe that the mind correlates with people’s behavior. People act a certain way due to their circumstances, for example, if a person is in lost in the mountains, they will have to think differently and act out of their comfort zone to try and survive. People’s behave a certain way due to the way they think. People think and behave differently due to their circumstances, some might think out of the box or even think and act the same way no matter what the circumstance or the situation that they are in. Ryle’s argument for behaviorism is knowing that our actions and words depict our behavior and knowing that we do not need to know everything about the mind in order to know how one's behavior. But I believe that it is very important to know how one thinks because it depicts their behavior. Not everyone thinks exactly the same or have the same mindset and that is what makes everyone unique in their own
Show More

Related Documents: Ryle's Argument For Behaviorism

Ryle's Initial Argument Against Cartesian Dualism

I. Part one: Ryle's initial argument against Cartesian dualism is based on an epistemological viewpoint, meaning that this view has to do with the existence and understanding of knowledge. He claims that if we were to believe the Cartesian explanation of dualism, which claims that the mind and the body are completely separate things, we would have no way of understanding what others are feeling or thinking. Seeing as, with this explanation, it would be impossible to understand another human’s behaviors…

Words 1938 - Pages 8