Scarlet Letter Good Vs Evil

Words: 1873
Pages: 8

Proverbs 5:22 proclaims that “The evil deeds of the wicked ensnare them; the chords of their sins hold them fast” (Old Testament). The Puritan Code was based on the Bible, and dictated unrealistic and destructive beliefs about sin. This led Puritans to hold an unforgiving set of morals that restricted their actions under the categories of only “good,” or only “evil.” Puritan minds were therefore convinced that the act of sin, and the sinner, exclusively fell under “evil.” Nathaniel Hawthorne creates a strong opposition to this ideology in The Scarlet Letter. He believed that sin should not be subjected to just good or evil, rather a combination of both. He toys with the Puritans unattainable standards, and provides a more realistic view of their “utopia.” In The Scarlet Letter, Nathaniel Hawthorne’s …show more content…
As a “law,” Puritan Society was obligated to view Pearl as “wicked” and a “devil child,” when in actuality she was the cultivation of beauty and light. As a result of Pearls birth, Hester Prynne, her mother, was branded with a Scarlet Letter “A” on her chest. The reader discovers that Pearl was the embodiment of the Scarlet “A,” because they had many of the same characteristics. The Puritans viewed the letter, and therefore Pearl, as a symbol of sin, dishonor, and malevolence. Contradicting this perspective, Hawthorne perceived the letter as being “artistically done… so fantastically embroidered and illuminated” (Hawthorne 51-52). The letter was to be viewed as a beautiful piece of art that shone bright towards the world. Pearl was much like the letter in this way: she had a “rich and luxuriant beauty; a beauty that shone with deep and vivid tints” (Hawthorne 97). She was meant to be perceived as magnificent and bright, but the Puritans viewed her instead as a “devil child,” likely sent from hell. Simply because of her birth, Pearl was cast aside from society as a stain