Scientific Revolution Research Paper

Words: 585
Pages: 3

Advancements in science were less so about improvements in our knowledge of physical and natural world, but rather a change in the thoughts behind ideas. This is what is to be known as the Scientific Revolution. The World Civilizations textbook states that Medieval and Renaissance science exaggerated reliance on authority as opposed to evidence. It was the Pope that the church turned to for explanations of science. Things like how our galaxy is set up. The Pope spoke from the bible without giving any really facts or evidence supporting his claims. The church went out of their way to explain everything the people had questions for. They were the government and religious foundation in one. A main belief of the church was that the Earth was at the center of the universe and all other planetary bodies moved around the Earth. This is known as the geocentric theory. With solid facts, this theory was proven wrong, but the authorities of the church did not care much for the challenging of their ideas. As a result, they named anyone who challenged them a heretic and other consequences followed. The Pope should no longer give the reasoning of the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the behavior of the physical and natural world through observation. The Bible should no longer tell what is and is not correct. …show more content…
Copernicus and Galileo were named heretics by the Papacy for challenging the Geocentric theory with the correct Heliocentric theory. Grievance #2: The ideas of the church and the science community can contradict. The Catholic Galileo was threatened with imprisonment if he did not retract parts of what he had published in one of his books. Grievance #3: A theory must be supported by evidence before it is an argument. The church threatened scientists who challenged their ideas such as Copernicus due to the Church’s lack of support for their own