Shooting An Elephant Rhetorical Analysis

Words: 1135
Pages: 5

“And suddenly I realized that I should have to shoot the elephant after all. The people expected it of me and I had got to do it; I could feel their two thousand wills pressing me forward, irresistibly” (4). The presumption that a ruler has absolute power over the people is proven as invalid once the ruler is dictated by the wills of the commonalty. Because of this shift in power, the speaker recognizes how a tyrant does not always have control over the masses. In “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell reveals that imperialism destroys he freedom of not just the oppressed, but also the oppressor as well. Orwell proves how imperialism destroys the freedom of both the Burmese and the agents of imperialism. In order to achieve his purpose, Orwell establishes authority through shifts in verb tense, specific knowledge, and word choice; appeals to logic through comparisons; and develops an emotional connection with the audience through imagery and …show more content…
Even more, he appeals to logic through comparisons; and establishes an emotional connection through sensory details and colloquial language, With the rhetorical strategies that Orwell employs to convey his claim, he is able to prove how tyranny is not always as what it seems. In a worthless effort to gain power, a tyrant and the common people are both affected negatively. However, majority would assume that the tyrant benefits from this, when in reality it is the opposite. Orwell’s essay, “Shooting an Elephant,” informs the audience who is unknowledgeable about imperialism to reduce the risk of making the same mistake of supporting tyranny. The individuals who have read this essay have been informed by Orwell of how to prevent unfavourable outcomes for everyone, one should not support the tyrannical