Should Athletes Be Paid In Sports?

Words: 519
Pages: 3

Athletes are accused of crimes in the news all the time. This has because a social normality for such an occurrence. What has been up for debate, however, is whether or not this should disqualify said athlete from the sport. There are those who would argue both sides. The author of this paragraph is quite neutral leaning towards yes towards the punishment. In some cases such as with Mike Danton, who was a professional in the NHL, was accused and convicted of murder. A crime this severe deserves disqualification in the eyes of the public. Another example being Melvin Hall Jr, on the San Francisco Giants, was convicted with aggravated assault of a child. This case serves as another example of when it is acceptable to disqualify athletes from …show more content…
This is something that seems reasonable in the view of the population, if a little severe. It should be well established, however, that crimes do not go unpunished so as to discourage athletes in the first place from committing them. It could be argued that if society is going to go this far why not go all the way? This is to say why not punish those who have committed small and insignificant crimes. This would discourage athletes even more so from committing crimes as well as represent the idea that committing a crime of any severity is unacceptable. The last question that needs to be addressed is: Do we institute such a rule for athletes and sports of both levels (professional and not)? This would make sense for the smaller crimes to be punished as severely as others because professional athletes are older adults, or they know that they are supposed to be role models for children and should be setting a good example. What about for high school and college students? The author would argue that it makes sense to institute the same rules that professional athletes must abide by. However, with society the way it is, when are children allowed to make