Smiley V. Smiley Case

Words: 566
Pages: 3

The first and utmost similarity that was important in both of the criminal offense cases was that they were both Federal Court held cases. The government had jurisdiction over both cases. Mainly because of the type of crimes they were and, most importantly, where they were committed. Shooting in a public setting and putting civilians lives in danger, and stealing goods belonging to the U.S. As some may say when it comes to jurisdiction, just let the big boys handle it.
I stated the definition of geographical jurisdiction before and, as I called it, its child venue. Smiley found the goods off the coast of Mexico but his case was held in San Francisco.
This venue suited the case because the sunken vessel the Golden Gate was originally from San Fran and also there is where the complaint was filed. Usually the trial would be held in
…show more content…
In Smiley’s case he got his charges dropped with the help of jurisdiction. In Loughner’s case he admitted to the charges caught red handed with the weapon, jurisdiction couldn’t acquit him of anything.
Within the cases portion I stated the general information explaining what happen pertaining the Smiley case. There’s a portion in the Crimes Act of 1825 which made Smiley’s case work out in his favor, because of jurisdiction. Once Smiley and his company got a signed document from Mexico to search everything of their borders the goods were apart of that deal. Only because the U.S. stop claiming them which made the goods, legally, anyone's. The beauty of jurisdiction got Smiley and his company charges dropped.
In Loughner’s situation jurisdiction got him a fair trial but it wasn’t enough to get him off. I mean we all would hope jurisdiction doesn’t get a man who shot killed and injured innocent civilians just because off. However it did make things a little easier for