Social Bond Theory

Words: 911
Pages: 4

Introduction
In the criminal justice field, it is important for us to understand what causes criminal acts by individuals. In order for us to understand what causes it, we will need to explain what the theories are for those causations. Therefore, we will explain causation of crime: Social Bonding, Social Control, and Labeling what it represents. Then we will identify the similarities between them and identify the differences between them, and follow up with our evaluation (explanation) as to why crimes occur. Then includes their subsequent categories by explain how they fit within the criminal justice system and list the causation of crime.

Social Bonding/Control
Ortiz (n.d.) helps us to understand that before we called this
…show more content…
Thereby, Hirschi and Matsueda agree with the above statements. Social bonding theory has another element according to Hass (2001), and that is the belief that generally it can be construed as an ethical belief regarding the rules and the laws of society. this is one of the most supported and examined element of the social bond. It also believes that a person who feels that they should not or should abide by criminal justice rules. This “element also presumes that there is a common value system, but those who are delinquent do not necessarily agree with it’ (Hass, 2001).
Example of the four elements of social bonding theory
Matsueda (1989) also considered this theory as deviance as being taken for granted and considered conformity as being problematic, and it is made up of four elements which commitment to traditional types of action, attachment to significant others, involvement in traditional activities, and beliefs in the moral values of society.
Labeling
…show more content…
Within the criminal justice system, this is very important for law enforcement bodies and criminologists who work really hard to rehabilitate offenders. Labeling theory accentuates that offender behavior happens when the leading social collection that set out to label the minorities are viewed as the ones that will be committing those actions, that cuts along the grain of social norms. Labelling Theory And (2015) states that the theory discussed how the behavior and self-identity can be influenced or determined by different terms which the dominant population uses to classify or describe them. Because, when community gives unconstructive connotations to a person, this will influence them to adopt certain labels that will attach to them, sometimes permanently.
The similarities/ differences between Social Control, Social Bonding, and Labeling?
Bonding Theories:
• a full range of short and long-term significance
• “social control and self-control are the same thing and described elements of social bond elements measure self-control” (“Social Control Theory”, n.d.)
Social Control Theory:
• assumption that individuals have uniform impetus for crime and deviance and one question why did they