Standardized Testing Arguments

Words: 816
Pages: 4

From children throwing up and having panic attacks, to children opting out of tests, there are many negative reactions to standardized testing. Standardized testing has affected millions of students across the U.S alone. Is testing really a benefit for students if it has been the cause of so much strife? Schools should eliminate standardized testing. When did standardized testing originate? Standardized testing such as IQ tests, ASK, PARCC, SATs, FCATs and exit exams have started in the early 1930s and increased in the early 2000s (Chronology). Education back then has been heightened because “Progressive education reformers advocate increased testing to provide a more concrete, scientific method for judging whether students are learning” …show more content…
However, in today’s society, both testing companies and citizens of the United States have been negatively impacted due to the frequent amount of testing students receive a year. The government has been demanding a multitude of tests, creating havoc for testing companies. The effect of the high requisition from the government caused testing companies to produce too much tests, too quickly and too cheaply (Scoring). From the demand, it resulted in tests scorers to make major errors upon a student’s test result. Let us take high school exit exams for example. At least 74% of high school students have to take exit exams in 2012, which means that 26% of students opted out (“By the Numbers”). Unfortunately, for the ones that did take the exam, some of those students were not allowed to graduate because of the low score they received. In most cases, it was caused by scoring errors by test scorers (“Scoring”). Eventually, the undergraduate will receive their high school diploma only if their adjusted score is a passing grade …show more content…
On May, 2009, the CCS was created. “May: Forty-four states and the District of Columbia have adopted the Common Core Standards. Debate rages amid criticisms that the standards are confusing and complicated” (“Chronology”). The critics are not wrong. Of course, states should adapt to the standards to their needs, but without the CCS, it would be like Missouri mirroring Mississippi with the same exact standards. The process itself would be confusing because if two states were to have the same requirements, it would mess up the whole purpose of the Common Core Standard