‘Weber described the state as an organisation which profitably demands a "monopoly on the legalised use of violence"’. (Weber)
According to the oxfords learners dictionary also “State is a country considered as an organized political community controlled by one government’’ (Dictionaries)
Aristotle describes the state as a frame of citizens looking for adequate ambition in life, with the aim to conclude what is and what is not the act of a state. Firstly, Aristotle tries to analyse the question of what gives the state its identity. Evidently the identity of place and inhabitants are not excluded. It is evidently clear that it being the principle of an idea, it exists in general as a form but not in its matter. The principle of the state must be desired in its constitution and if this theory is found to be true, it will be clear to note that the similarities between the states are based mainly on the similarities of the constitution. It may or may not be given the same name, and all this depends on whether the citizens are the same or entirely diverse. It is evidently clear and easy to say that the analysis provided in identifying of a state is about as accurate as it could possibly be.
The state has been defined in many ways: one where it is described as an ancient political community that uses security as an economic exchange in order to gain revenue. The state has also been described as the government and even a protection racket. A state is entirely made up of the society, government as well as the people residing in that area.
Sovereignty can simply be defined as power or authority. It is the ability of a state to act independently in a geographic area. The principle of supreme power and authority, is reflected in the claim by the state to be the sole author of the laws implemented within its state. There are two types of sovereignty
Internal sovereignty: This refers to the location of power within the state
External sovereignty: Which is also known as national or state sovereignty. It can be defined as the ability of a state to act independently within the global state.
International relations is described to be scrutinizing of relationships among different countries and it is an extremely large term of political science. International relations can also be described as the study of foreign affairs and global issues among states within the international system, including the roles of states, inter-governmental organizations (IGOs), non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and multinational corporations (MNCs).
During the period anterior to World War II the state was much more important in international relations, the state had the power to declare state of wars and had more authority over economic influence within the world. Subsequently after World War II regarding international relations the impact of the state has declined over the years.
This essay would analyse the states' great decline in international relations by evaluating several actors in international relations.
Non-governmental organizations are corporations that have been legally constituted and are created by legal people who do not operate within the government. The influence of non-governmental organizations has had a great increase in international relations. After World War II several international organizations came into existence as the levels of economic, political, social and cultural transactions among individuals grew.
However because of globalisation organisations that are private and non-governmental have had a great amount of influence on the development and execution of global policy. An example to illustrate this would be the major credit rating agencies, such as Moody’s and standard and poor’s They determine the credit statues of governments and corporations around the world.
Therefore in that sense