TANF Positive Outcomes

Words: 773
Pages: 4

Evidence of positive outcomes: The positive outcome from the TANF is it serves a percentage of poor families. It’s a monthly cash assistance for low income families with children under the age of 18. According to the text a reduction in TANF caseloads have decreased and employment has heightened (Chapin, 2017, p. 422 & 405). Another positive result reported in the article “Unfair Welfare: The TANF Resources Problem” is block grants raises the states’ marginal cost of adding a new TANF recipient, especially since the federal contribution is fixed. This in turn increases their benefit from reducing recipients. (Meni, 2016, para. 7).
Evidence of cost effectiveness and sustainability:
According to Think Progress in 2015 some states require for
…show more content…
Other alternative methods to strengthen policy is use outcome measures in TANF to evaluate state job-placement and job-retention efforts. Develop mandatory transition plans for SSI child clients before age 18 and encourage states to help the nonworking poor find employment and connect with services. Social barriers continue to exist, people of color often discriminated upon in meeting TANF requirements. Studies report that poorer states receive less TANF funding. TANF dollars per poor child shows that richer states are given more resource (Meni, 2016, para 15). On the other hand, TANF is ineffective at reducing poverty as their primary goal is not to decrease poverty or improve a child’s well-being. Ultimately, one of TANF’s essential goals as stated in the text is to decrease TANF caseloads and increase employment. Many TANF supporters agree this is a positive development as legislation targets to reduce dependence on public assistance. (Chapin, 2017, p. 387). Politically, legislation felt federal spending for low-income families needed to be reduced because it was too high, and a reduction was necessary to reduce federal spending. An efficient improvement and a feasible alternative to help strengthen the TANF policy especially regarding the poorer states are that no states should see a decrease in block