Teleological Argument Analysis

Words: 850
Pages: 4

I. 1. The problem of evil begins with the idea that there is an all righteous, all powerful, and all knowing God. In this case, the evil and suffering that does exist in the world is heavily questioned. The problem of evil is that if there is an all powerful God, why can he not control the suffering people he loves endures. If there is an all knowing God, why does he not stop the evil and suffering. In David Hume’s Dialogues of Natural Religion, he uses the problem of evil to argue God’s moral nature. Hume says that if there is an all righteous and perfect God, then why is their evil and suffering present in the world. He also suggest that since their is evil and suffering in the universe, then our own God’s moral righteous is not what we thought. The problem of evil is an idea that is attacked by all, as it is used to question the arguments concerning God’s moral soul. The problem of evil is brought up throughout every argument mostly due to the fact that the problem of evil rises so many questions in the belief of an all right and good God. …show more content…
A teleological argument, also known as an argument from design, is used to argue the order of the world and the existence of God. In Greek language, telos meaning “purpose” or “end” is derived from the world teleological. With this, the teleological argument suggest that the universe has an intelligent designer, and that the universe is ordered for a purpose or end. William Paley used the teleological argument as an argument from analogy. With the teleological argument, Paley links the universe to a watch and compares the working complex parts of a watch to the complex ways a universe works. He also suggest that just as a watch has an intelligent designer, the universe does too. The teleological argument is an approach that is useful to help philosophers argue between that of an intelligent designer, or the universe being by