The Argument Essay: The Nature Of Free Will

Words: 535
Pages: 3

To ponder upon the nature of freedom is to ponder upon our relationship to the world; to what extent we are bound to the world and to what extent are we limited by the world as we encounter it. To measure this extent is impossible, yet it is this very limit that is a cause for debate amongst philosophers across the world and across the ages. We use the term “free will” to refer to this limit but what really is free will? There are many definitions of free will but one can look at it as is a philosophical term for a particular sort of capacity of rational agents to choose a course of action from among various alternatives. Free will is intimately connected to concepts like responsibility, blame, praise, ‘just’ punishment, and the like (some argue that free will is central to notions of moral obligation). Amongst the different philosophical positions on the subject is the idea of determinism. Determinism is most easily described as ‘fate’: the notion that past events following the laws of nature will bring about future events. Our ‘fates’ or …show more content…
They define free will as the freedom to act according to your own motives without hindrance from others. Incompatibilism on the other hand, is the theory that says; since your actions are predefined and there are no other alternatives (assuming determinism to hold), and since by definition, alternatives are required to have free will, then the theory of free will is not compatible with determinism. This seems like a logical view, especially for someone just entering the discussion, but as with everything else in philosophy, there is no black and white. Libertarians claim that incompatibilism is true but that we have free will. Free Will skeptics claim that incompatibilism is true but that we don’t have free