The Controversy Of Banning E-Cigarettes

Words: 1649
Pages: 7

There are reasons why people believe that they are bad, why do people want to ban e-cigarettes and why people do not want to be based on what knowledge has come out over the years and why their point is justified. E-cigarettes are electronic devices that heat liquid and turn it into smoke and normally contain nicotine, which is in the smoke you inhale into your lungs. One of the reasons that people think that the laws would be good is to help kids not smoke when they are young and hurt their brains and a reason that people don’t want the laws is it gives more reasons for kids to go to secondary markets to try and get e-cigarettes and to get them hurt or dead. Are the laws limiting vaping good or bad and what are the reasons for the argument that says that they are good or that they are bad? are there certain laws that they think are bad? are there multiple laws that they think are bad? and are there laws that one said thinks are good but doesn’t agree with the others or …show more content…
This shows that that e-cigarettes are the better alternative to cigarettes and that banning e-cigarettes and not banning cigarettes could be worse than not banning either because they should at least be able to have the option to get a better alternative and they shouldn’t have the better option; banning cigarettes would be better because they have more nicotine in them. To show why people are against banning the sale and use of e-cigarettes and why people believe that there’s more harm to be caused by banning the use and sale of e-cigarettes than good. It could harm adults who want to stop smoking by making it harder to find a better alternative. “It would help keep people smoking deadly cigarettes that appeal to teens” (Youth vaping