The Crucible And Scarlet Letter Comparison

Words: 492
Pages: 2

Thematic Connections Between Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, The Scarlet Letter and The Crucible Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, The Scarlet Letter and The Crucible all contain one of the two branches of modern philosophical thought, also known as theological ethics. Theological ethics associate with religion, and are discernible throughout each piece of literature. Each author uses religion to control society in each of their texts. They display wrong Christian behavior in their writings in order to get society to want to attain good Christian behavior. Another name for theological ethics is Christian ethics. There are three theological virtues in Christian ethics: faith, love, and hope. These virtuals all associate with God. The virtue of faith is the belief in God. The virtue of love states that we should love …show more content…
All authors use religion to control society. Jonathan Edwards scared people by saying if they don’t follow religion they would burn in Hell. He did this so more people would become one with God and more religious. In The Scarlet Letter, Hester Prynne is the prime example of what not to do in their society. If someone goes against religion, they will get punished just like Hester. In The Crucible, anyone who goes against their religion by participating in witchcraft will be hung. Each piece of literature coerces each society to have good Christian behavior, rather than wrong Christian behavior as shown in Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, The Scarlet Letter and The Crucible Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, The Scarlet Letter and The Crucible all incorporate a branch of modern philosophical thought, also known as theological ethics. Theological ethics, or Christian ethics, contain three main virtues. These virtues are faith, love, and hope. All of the texts use religion to control society in order to create good Christian behavior among the